Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
74. Oh? I just looked it up.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jul 2013

In my Webster's New World College Dictionary that I was required to buy in journalism school. It's not in there. Now, I did buy that in the eighties, but it appears the term was a bit remote at least. And of course, I said the term was either new or remote, so that just demonstrates again that you don't understand relevance.

Even so, I looked it up on dictionary.com, and this is what they say about the word's origins:


A word coined by Jack E. Myers to represent current and future lines of products implementing the concepts of his MetaModel, and also to designate his company The Metadata Company that would develop and market those products.
A data and publication search performed when Myers coined the term, early in the summer of 1969, did not discover any use either of the word "metadata" or "meta data". Myers used the term in a 1973 product brochure and it is an Incontestable registered U.S. Trademark.


So, they not only know it wasn't use seventy years ago, but they know the exact time it was coined, who coined it, what use they had, and that the use was remote and very specialized until the government recently took over Mr. Myers' Trademark apparently as a kind of Orwellian eminent domain. And it appears the government has assigned it a different meaning. All I know is what the meaning sounds like it should be.

Seventy years? More like forty, but you did just pull that out of your ass, didn't you? Like me, you only heard the term the for the first time five weeks ago, and so you presumed it always existed with the current usage. This is exactly what a fascist government loves you to do for it. You've been well-trained.

I'll tell what: someone with your wisdom, intellect and fearlessness belongs in a different party than I do. I don't even respect you enough now to refrain from insulting you. So with that, you go on ignore. Goodbye.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Action McNews Network. Boy..that lays it out. BlueJazz Jul 2013 #1
"Stop us before we are forced to commit journalism" G_j Jul 2013 #2
He needs to stop reading DU Ichingcarpenter Jul 2013 #3
K & R. I'd say he's in danger of being thrown under the bus, but I suspect... RufusTFirefly Jul 2013 #4
He has tire tracks on his forehead..........nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #34
Confirmation #5937 that Tom Tomorrow is constantly bullwinkle428 Jul 2013 #5
When and if you DO find yourself on the opposite side of Tom Tomorrow... Bonobo Jul 2013 #6
The comments on Dailykos are quite interesting... L0oniX Jul 2013 #16
"as you no doubt noticed on your satellite photos." jonthebru Jul 2013 #26
What is that little ant-like critter crawling around in your post? retired rooster Jul 2013 #57
True words. mbperrin Jul 2013 #23
I'm sure there's room under the Dead Messenger Bus somewhere ... DirkGently Jul 2013 #68
K&R& How many of these have we seen defended by long time posters right here? n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #7
dozens byeya Jul 2013 #33
kick nt Bonobo Jul 2013 #8
Meta - please lock. nm MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #9
Tom Tomorrow must be visiting DU. L0oniX Jul 2013 #10
Snort. Fawke Em Jul 2013 #11
Oh no....Greenwals loves dogs? zeemike Jul 2013 #19
Rescues homeless dogs. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #45
Just like HITLER did! DirkGently Jul 2013 #66
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth Jul 2013 #12
Haha! Apophis Jul 2013 #13
:o) Solly Mack Jul 2013 #14
That's going to leave a mark. xocet Jul 2013 #15
I pity those who posted stuff in their teens.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #17
The only thing missing is the sensible, pragmatic, Reality Based Wood Chuck. bvar22 Jul 2013 #18
Why, that's ridiculous! She would be blonde! (Otherwise spot-on.) n/t Bossy Monkey Jul 2013 #20
I expect to hear the sound of crickets from certain quarters on DU nxylas Jul 2013 #21
If the info Ed Snowden exposed is relevant, why isn't the info from James O'Keefe relevant? baldguy Jul 2013 #22
Because O'Keefe's "info" was pure unadulterated deliberate bullshit. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #24
And that's the real reason. caseymoz Jul 2013 #30
PLUS ONE! nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #36
"Whereas all of Snowden's allegations have stood up." Bullshit. baldguy Jul 2013 #37
Once again posting blog opinions as unassailable fact whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #38
As if Greenwald's columns were anything but opinion. baldguy Jul 2013 #39
His columns are partly opinion pieces. The Guardian news articles were not. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #41
OK, fine. Show me where I'm wrong. baldguy Jul 2013 #49
I already did. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #55
All of Snowdens assurtions are lies. baldguy Jul 2013 #56
Democratic Senators, a former Democratic President, and former intelligence agents disagree. Maedhros Jul 2013 #59
"All of Snowden's assertions are lies." Hissyspit Jul 2013 #60
"All of Snowden's assertions are lies" and, simultaneously, somehow terribly TERRIBLY damaging MNBrewer Jul 2013 #61
The first is an opinion piece . . . caseymoz Jul 2013 #63
As if Greenwald's columns were anything but opinion. baldguy Jul 2013 #64
I used illegal instead of unconstitutional caseymoz Jul 2013 #70
Great post, caseymoz! whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #71
So, just because you don't *understand* something, that automatically means it's nefarious? baldguy Jul 2013 #73
Oh? I just looked it up. caseymoz Jul 2013 #74
Obstinate. Ignorant. Arrogant. baldguy Jul 2013 #75
More to the point PATRICK Jul 2013 #62
PLUS ONE! nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #35
The seventh panel!!! muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Comrade Grumpy Jul 2013 #27
"Because the veracity of the info matters." ljm2002 Jul 2013 #31
Oy vey. progressoid Jul 2013 #40
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2013 #28
K&R!!! DeSwiss Jul 2013 #29
K&R! Tom, that is downright fucking incredible! Enthusiast Jul 2013 #32
sadly, scarily accurate nilram Jul 2013 #42
K&R hay rick Jul 2013 #43
LOL, Mr. Tomorrow SO nails our swooners, who echo our embarrassing "media" Skittles Jul 2013 #44
I love how the male news reader finally smiles at the very (first these messages) end.... democrank Jul 2013 #46
their expressions are perfect G_j Jul 2013 #47
Everybody knows he's a racist Obama hater. reusrename Jul 2013 #48
I hear Tom Tomorrow is dating a pole dancer! DirkGently Jul 2013 #51
With boxes in his garage! reusrename Jul 2013 #58
Tom Tomorrow is rumored to be a Whig! DirkGently Jul 2013 #65
Tom Tomorrow reads DU. And loves it! n/t DirkGently Jul 2013 #50
k/r Dawson Leery Jul 2013 #52
Reads like another day in DU land burnodo Jul 2013 #53
Dying to know his handle here. n/t DirkGently Jul 2013 #67
Kinda reminds me of MSNBC or CNN. 99Forever Jul 2013 #54
Obviously Tom Tomorrow never loved Obama RetroLounge Jul 2013 #69
Tom Tomorrow, fess up Matariki Jul 2013 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The important questions -...»Reply #74