General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Germans illuminate message on US embassy [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)Kim Dotcom's site had copies of AVATAR available to swipe. And it's not just Hollywood--it's Bollywood, it's the British Film Institute, the French, the Italians, the Spanish...
And the problem isn't that there aren't plenty of people watching the shit--there are. And the problem isn't paying customers either, there are a lot of 'em. But the laborer is worthy of his hire. Kim Dotcom is the fence who receives the stolen goods and passes them on for a fee.
There's just no justification for it. It's not just movies, it's television--everything on the premium channels as well as the sitcoms, etc. It's music, too. You don't think that studio musician deserves his royalty?
Justifying piracy is justifying theft. People who pay Kim Dotcom a fee to trade stolen goods are not "seals." That's just a lousy analogy, sorry.