Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
13. Does that mean we'll stop constructing headquarters buildings we won't use?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 07:26 AM
Jul 2013

Perhaps we'll actually start looking at the things we're paying for. I mean, if we spent $34 million on a 64,000 square foot building that is state of the art for headquarters facilities, completing construction within a year of our departure, you have to wonder about the wisdom of those who are demanding no cuts to their budgets.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/a-brand-new-us-military-headquarters-in-afghanistan-and-nobody-to-use-it/2013/07/09/2bb73728-e8cd-11e2-a301-ea5a8116d211_story.html

Seriously, we built this monstrosity in Afghanistan, just as we're pulling out. Then this ass has the audacity to whine about cuts to his budget? It doesn't look like anyone has a clue about spending the money wisely. How many sick people were cured with that building? How many hungry people were fed? What great breakthrough did we move closer to on Climate change? Energy? You name it. It was wasted, money paid to a Contractor who built and set up a building that we never intended to use. What was the Contractor, a relative of someone in the budget office?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm willing to take that risk. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #1
Me too.............nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #12
me three.. DCBob Jul 2013 #15
If Hagel says $50Billion then cut it at least $100Billion byeya Jul 2013 #22
But I thought he was the Republican that was going to make cuts possible! Bonobo Jul 2013 #2
Yeah what happened to that? avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #5
The WAR Machine SamKnause Jul 2013 #3
No, that's the severe and unacceptable effect of a Democrat seating a Republican in the cabinet. pa28 Jul 2013 #4
Like maybe the "severe" and "unacceptable" effects of using that money area51 Jul 2013 #6
Such a tool. Nominated to uphold the status quo. Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #7
They could save billions if they stopped violating the 4th amendment Cronus Protagonist Jul 2013 #8
Exactly how many billion dollar ultimate weapon programs have they reduced trimmed or eliminated? Ford_Prefect Jul 2013 #9
I have a better plan than cutting $52 Billion Sherman A1 Jul 2013 #10
You know what they won't cut? The multibillion dollar corporate welfare Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #11
Does that mean we'll stop constructing headquarters buildings we won't use? Savannahmann Jul 2013 #13
Cutting that part of the 'infrastructure' located in other countries (700+ sites bike man Jul 2013 #14
Please let this be the end of the chess messiah bullshit. TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #16
It didn't take long to disprove that theory, did it? kentuck Jul 2013 #17
I'm sure lots. I'd already seen that play in the first term and it turned out to be bull TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #31
Considering the Army found 900M reflection Jul 2013 #18
Of course it would, Catherina! Cutting one thin dime, would immeasurably damage cali Jul 2013 #19
Well there ya go. Autumn Jul 2013 #20
The cuts the Pentagon has already made so far means that... Hubert Flottz Jul 2013 #21
Yeah, to people like General Dynamics, Lockheed, General Electric, Halliburton. hobbit709 Jul 2013 #23
Looks like the military is a huge welfare program burnodo Jul 2013 #24
Maybe they should persue peace then. Coyotl Jul 2013 #25
Oooh! Bite your tongue. Some things are sacred. byeya Jul 2013 #27
Hagel is saying the Bush tax cuts are having "severe and unacceptable effects" Coyotl Jul 2013 #28
Cutting food stamps and Social Security and doubling student loan interest rates will also cause djean111 Jul 2013 #26
They should cut ten times the amount! Roll back the empire of corporations on point Jul 2013 #29
If DOD cannot absorb the $52 billion cut, wonder where those cuts will come from? indepat Jul 2013 #30
Tell me again why Hagel was the "good Republican" we could "accept"? WinkyDink Jul 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hagel: Cutting $52 billio...»Reply #13