Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ms.smiler

(551 posts)
21. Customerserviceguy, would you kindly comment for me on an unusual situation?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jul 2013

There is something that puzzles me in my local land records. My state is a must record state, within 90 days of conveyance.

There is a property that had a Sheriff Deed in the name of an S & L that was closed during the scandal. During the same period I see many documents recorded on other properties in the name of the defunct S & L and Resolution Trust. It’s as though Resolution Trust came onto all the documents that were filed in the land records with that S & L. Satisfactions were filed in both names and both names appear on Assignments and Deeds. There is though that lone Sheriff Deed that doesn’t appear to have been conveyed, nor was there a mortgage that was filed or conveyed.

It really appears to me that Resolution Trust missed the one property. The Title remained unchanged for 20 years until a Quit Claim Deed was filed to an individual from a mortgage servicer and authorized agent for Wachovia current successors in interest to the S & L. Wachovia though doesn’t appear in the chain of Title.

So I’m wondering how Wachovia appears and becomes involved in the property. What was conveyed to them and what could they possibly convey?

So at the point where the Quit Claim Deed was filed, how readily would Title to the property be insurable? Should an individual in that situation be satisfied with such a Quit Claim Deed? Is such a property marketable?

I appreciate your experience and expertise, thank you.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Didn't you get the title researched? question everything Jul 2013 #1
Nope, can't track it....remember MERS???? dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #3
The mortgage was recorded on a certain date customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #4
Yeah, I can pop over to the courthouse and check dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #5
They're public records customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #6
Customerserviceguy, would you kindly comment for me on an unusual situation? ms.smiler Jul 2013 #21
My experience is about eight years old at this point customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #22
Succession of interest doesn't show in the chain DirkGently Jul 2013 #28
DirkGently, thank you. I was curious about the purchase of such assets. ms.smiler Jul 2013 #45
QCD is a strange thing for a lending institution to do. DirkGently Jul 2013 #46
Thank you again DirkGently. So the individual has no guarantee regarding the Title ms.smiler Jul 2013 #47
The QCD isn't a problem in itself. Might cause some a bit DirkGently Jul 2013 #48
Yes, but a lot of transactions were not recorded with the Recorder of Deeds locally Samantha Jul 2013 #10
I spent twenty-five years in the title insurance industry customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #11
I am repeating to you what was reported more than once at that time Samantha Jul 2013 #13
Then whoever the closer was customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #14
Here is just one example Samantha Jul 2013 #15
I'm fully aware of that story customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #16
My original mortgage WAS recorded. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #19
My best guess customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #23
Dixiegrrrrl, that sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen. pnwmom Jul 2013 #42
Yes, not the original mortgage but those bundled and backed by securities Samantha Jul 2013 #25
Yes, but that's not about recording of mortgages, but other recordings Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #17
This article better references what I am talking about Samantha Jul 2013 #24
Samantha, how about you compare MERS cute little theory about the lack of a need to ms.smiler Jul 2013 #29
Ms. Smiler, in a must-record state the original documents are usually done in MERS name. Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #32
Regardless of MERS business practices, PA statutes require that ALL ms.smiler Jul 2013 #33
Once the mortgage is done in MERS' name, there is no conveyance Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #38
I believe you misunderstood me Samantha Jul 2013 #37
Okay, but that is about assignments, not mortgages Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #31
I thought we were going to end realizing we had a terminology miss! Samantha Jul 2013 #35
MERS has never been the servicer Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #39
Yo Mama, you are correct, MERS is not a mortgage servicer. ms.smiler Jul 2013 #44
is it true you don't need to pay your mortgage if the lender ZRT2209 Jul 2013 #26
ZRT2209, Most of the time it is untrue Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #30
wow! thanks! ZRT2209 Jul 2013 #34
MERS probably happened after you left the industry -- or at least, it probably pnwmom Jul 2013 #41
Actually, to be more specific.. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #9
Not if there was a MERS transfer, which is what happened to my friend's mortgage, twice! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #20
No, that doesn't work for this anymore. pnwmom Jul 2013 #40
I admit, am not familiar with MER question everything Jul 2013 #43
Make them make the payments, then ... zbdent Jul 2013 #2
Contact a lawyer. Brigid Jul 2013 #7
The Bullshit goes Deep but not the prosecutions FreakinDJ Jul 2013 #8
kick. Liberal_in_LA Jul 2013 #12
We are a nation of clouded property Titles because of fraud, securitization and MERS. ms.smiler Jul 2013 #18
The banks did a lot of crooked stuff -- this isn't really one of them. DirkGently Jul 2013 #27
Yep. Another here that went from Countrywide to BofA and didn't know Lucinda Jul 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fannie Mae claims to have...»Reply #21