General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm really disheartened reading comments all over the web about this trial... [View all]Singlemalt
(61 posts)Here is what you said:
"That said (profanity follows...) why the FUCK would anyone defend Zimmerman? Fuck the "reasonable doubt", we live in a nation that professes to believe in something that CANNOT be proved with a reasonable doubt so toss that out the window (sincere apologies to anyone of faith--i'll defend your right to believe what you do unless you try and shove it down my throat). Based on the lies this shit-stain has told I wouldn't believe anyone would defend him. Yet there they are, in their not-even-thinly-veiled racism, defending this sociopath."
You seem to indicate quite clearly a determination of reasonable doubt if de facto "not-even-thinly-veiled racism" and "defending this sociopath." So as I asked do you feel if one concludes "reasonable doubt" this is to "defend Zimmerman?" You make it quite plain it is to be a thinly veiled racist and this puzzles me.