Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

krispos42

(49,445 posts)

2. This is a Florida-specific legality, then?

Reply to dkf (Reply #1)

Fri Jul 12, 2013, 04:04 AM

Jul 2013

He was getting his information from the talking heads on TV, presumably Faux News, so I had a bit of hesitation to trust him.

Could you clarify "judge rules that defendant affirmed self defense by preponderance of the evidence", please?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Request a clarification of "justifiable homicide" defense. [View all] krispos42 Jul 2013 OP

Your uncle is right. dkf Jul 2013 #1

This is a Florida-specific legality, then? krispos42 Jul 2013 #2

Z had to affirm it was self defense by preponderance of evidence. dkf Jul 2013 #3

The defendant does not even need to meet a preponderance standard onenote Jul 2013 #5

Self defense is legal in all 50 states. ... spin Jul 2013 #4

Should every self-defense case go to a jury? davidn3600 Jul 2013 #6

Here are the jury instructions for this trial. Travis_0004 Jul 2013 #7

But isn't that instruction only given if the judge finds that the self-defense charge is supported? Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #9

In a jurisdiction such as Florida, its generally a question for the jury onenote Jul 2013 #10

Thanks - I know state law has a lot to do with it and this is not my bag Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #11

It really makes no difference Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #8