Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Introduces 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act [View all]PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)45. Of course he could have vetoed it and made them override his video.
There is no requirement for him to sign it.
http://www.archives.gov/legislative/resources/education/veto/background.pdf
But he was in favor of it. Here is what Clinton said about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act he signed:
Today I am pleased to sign into law S. 900, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. This historic legislation will modernize our financial services laws, stimulating greater innovation and competition in the financial services industry. America's consumers, our communities, and the economy will reap the benefits of this Act.
Beginning with the introduction of an Administration-sponsored bill in 1997, my Administration has worked vigorously to produce financial services legislation that would not only spur greater competition, but also protect the rights of consumers and guarantee that expanded financial services firms would meet the needs of America's underserved communities. Passage of this legislation by an overwhelming, bipartisan majority of the Congress suggests that we have met that goal.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act makes the most important legislative changes to the structure of the U.S. financial system since the 1930s. Financial services firms will be authorized to conduct a wide range of financial activities, allowing them freedom to innovate in the new economy. The Act repeals provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act that, since the Great Depression, have restricted affiliations between banks and securities firms. It also amends the Bank Holding Company Act to remove restrictions on affiliations between banks and insurance companies. It grants banks significant new authority to conduct most newly authorized activities through financial subsidiaries.
Removal of barriers to competition will enhance the stability of our financial services system. Financial services firms will be able to diversify their product offerings and thus their sources of revenue. They will also be better equipped to compete in global financial markets.
Beginning with the introduction of an Administration-sponsored bill in 1997, my Administration has worked vigorously to produce financial services legislation that would not only spur greater competition, but also protect the rights of consumers and guarantee that expanded financial services firms would meet the needs of America's underserved communities. Passage of this legislation by an overwhelming, bipartisan majority of the Congress suggests that we have met that goal.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act makes the most important legislative changes to the structure of the U.S. financial system since the 1930s. Financial services firms will be authorized to conduct a wide range of financial activities, allowing them freedom to innovate in the new economy. The Act repeals provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act that, since the Great Depression, have restricted affiliations between banks and securities firms. It also amends the Bank Holding Company Act to remove restrictions on affiliations between banks and insurance companies. It grants banks significant new authority to conduct most newly authorized activities through financial subsidiaries.
Removal of barriers to competition will enhance the stability of our financial services system. Financial services firms will be able to diversify their product offerings and thus their sources of revenue. They will also be better equipped to compete in global financial markets.
Read the full statement at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=56922
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AMEN! She has huge courage and excellent values. She's looking out for the public like
AikidoSoul
Jul 2013
#65
What those in Washington don't realize is going along with someone like Warren is all that stands
yurbud
Jul 2013
#32
This is a necessity. We need to make this a big election issue in 2014. It will favor Democrats
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#7
Finally something I can be proud of. Cantwell is my senator. Thank you Warren, Cantwell, and King.
liberal_at_heart
Jul 2013
#9
You're absolutely right..Even if it passes in the Senate, it's DOA in the House.
red dog 1
Jul 2013
#72
Senators Warren, McCain, Cantwell, and King Introduce 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act
ProSense
Jul 2013
#17
Five and a half years after Bush, a DEMOCRATIC Senator finally introduces such a bill.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#20
And where are the so-called conservatives who want to return to the past?
lindysalsagal
Jul 2013
#25
And Hilary voted for the Iraq invasion, as well. And then made a snarky speech against it on the ste
lindysalsagal
Jul 2013
#53
He knew because the neocons wrote him a letter in 97 asking to invade iraq.
lindysalsagal
Jul 2013
#80
No, he isn't. Once the veto is overridden it becomes law without his signature. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jul 2013
#68
Thank You For Sharing - I Wish More Senators Represented Americans As Well
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#28
I'm pretty far left, almost to point of being socialist. You've peaked my curiosity.
liberal_at_heart
Jul 2013
#43
Because I don't consider anything that Warren asks for being more than common sense.
raouldukelives
Jul 2013
#55
And then how about a better anti-trust law? Something to breakup ANY "too big to fail."
tclambert
Jul 2013
#30