Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
13. exactly
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 05:11 PM
Feb 2012

my moral beliefs include the idea that it's not a good thing to have a lot of children. But I'm not going to try to force that on anyone. I also think others should have the right to engage in this moral practice if it is her or his belief too.

If someone else thinks they should engage in abstinence within marriage, that's their choice. But not mine. And that choice may not be forced upon others - esp. considering that both reproductive and sexual function medicines are covered, no big deal, because they deal with a variety of issues.

And because other medicines are included - this is clearly an attempt by a religious faction to force their sexual habits on the rest of the nation.

That violates the very essence of the separation of church and state.

Just because one religious group harbors intense desires to perform legislative rape on women - their vote doesn't make this action okay.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NH Republican: Married Co...»Reply #13