Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The ACLU's own text contradicts its case for Snowden's asylum bid. [View all]gholtron
(376 posts)45. Answers to.your questions.
why the administration threats tis no other countries if this is a mole hill?
Because Snowden stole government equipment with top secret classified information on it. And he broke the law by leaking such information. He is wanted by this country to stand trial for those actions. If other countries are helping him escape illegally, then there will be diplomatic issues
Why should all metadata be stored on all communications inside and outside this country?
Because it's a legal intelligent tool in which it is used to track terrorist and then if something is found, another warrant could be requested to read the emails if there is probable cause.
Why is it ok to hack our allies?
There is no proof of that. If there was then that is wrong and should be addressed.
How exactly are we safer?
I can't answer that question.
I wish I could be so naive and blind but I don't believe a letter next to a candidates name makes everything they do ok. You really believe that because administration officials say they aren't doing some of what Snowden claims, that they are being truthful.
Do you believe a person that you don't know that hasn't proven any violation of law and asking for asylum in countries that have a far more worse human rights violations than our own? Isn't that violating his own morals? Isn't that's why he did what he did in the first place? And you say you wish you were so naive? Maybe your wish came true.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sorry, but you used all those damned "linky-facty" things again, so clearly your post ...
11 Bravo
Jul 2013
#49
Oh good, the morning ProSense effort to claim that black is white, up is down..
Savannahmann
Jul 2013
#3
Definition of POLITICAL CRIME: a violation of the law for political rather than private reasons
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#21
It would be more informative if ProSense posted a thread-du-jour about illegal spying...
Sancho
Jul 2013
#13
Well ...someone has an agenda ...and what the NSA does isn't part of that agenda...
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#99
He's also applying our Bill of Rights to the entire world. Which smacks of irony and immense hubris.
randome
Jul 2013
#30
Recongizing the inalienable rights of all is not the same as governing them all.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#43
inalienable, unalienable - Inalienable and unalienable are interchangeable
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#50
Snowden has been charged with espionage. Espionage is a political crime.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#42