Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
19. And in another thread
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jul 2013

people here are questioning wether the jury in the Zimmerman trial should be trusted to hand down the 'correct' verdict.

So, apparently, it just comes down to who you, the individual, WANTS to believe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That will not alleviate the delusions of grandeur Snowden is experiencing. n/t Blackford Jul 2013 #1
lol. that strikes me as quite amusing. cali Jul 2013 #2
Not as "amusing" ProSense Jul 2013 #3
and that's related just how? In any case, A chacun son gout. cali Jul 2013 #6
By level of "amusing." ProSense Jul 2013 #9
At the risk of repeating myself: A chacun son gout. Knock yourself out. cali Jul 2013 #15
As amusing as Assange forging a travel document for Snowden? randome Jul 2013 #33
I bet that sent a cold chill down Snowden's spine railsback Jul 2013 #4
did you know the NSA was spying on you before last month upaloopa Jul 2013 #5
I knew the NSA was spying on people since Truman set it up railsback Jul 2013 #13
LOL Scurrilous Jul 2013 #18
LOL. Nice...nt Maximumnegro Jul 2013 #22
I asked if you knew the NSA was spying on you! upaloopa Jul 2013 #23
I suppose you have proof of this railsback Jul 2013 #24
you use email? you use a cell phone upaloopa Jul 2013 #26
Again, proof? railsback Jul 2013 #32
That's no rebuttal upaloopa Jul 2013 #35
Ok, so then no proof railsback Jul 2013 #36
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the ACLU beg to differ with the ambassador. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #7
Well: ProSense Jul 2013 #11
You say tomawto, they say tomato. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #14
And a US Ambassador has more credibility than any NGO. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #30
To you, perhaps. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #37
lol. allin99 Jul 2013 #8
As if the US government's opinion wasn't already clear to everyone. n/t magellan Jul 2013 #10
The grounding of a sovereign leader's plane Aerows Jul 2013 #12
that settles the issue.. when you want to know the truth about something - official statements Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #16
And in another thread railsback Jul 2013 #19
LOL nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #21
Kick! ProSense Jul 2013 #17
Have we killed the messenger yet? HB Gary would love to know.... think Jul 2013 #20
Some of these people think they can get away with any kind of lie flamingdem Jul 2013 #25
Because lies are 'in and there is really no punishment for that. Whisp Jul 2013 #28
By the time she was busted she had the Snowdenistas flamingdem Jul 2013 #29
Lies are 'in'. Shrewd observation. randome Jul 2013 #38
After WikiLeak's teleprompter crack railsback Jul 2013 #27
I checked and they hadn't deleted it flamingdem Jul 2013 #31
I think people are still in shock railsback Jul 2013 #34
Not Norman! Noooo!!! randome Jul 2013 #39
And if she's able to show her call log that the Ambassador did call Savannahmann Jul 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Updated: US ambassador to...»Reply #19