Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
20. Have we killed the messenger yet? HB Gary would love to know....
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 12:35 PM
Jul 2013

More facts emerge about the leaked smear campaigns

New emails cause a Palantir employee to be placed on leave, and more focus is needed on Hunton & Williams

Tuesday, Feb 15, 2011 04:16 AM CDT - By Glenn Greenwald

(updated below - Update II – Update III – Update IV)

As I noted on Friday, the parties implicated in the smear campaigns aimed at WikiLeaks supporters and Chamber of Commerce critics have attempted to heap all the blame on HBGary Federal (“HBGary”) and its CEO, Aaron Barr. Both Bank of America and the Chamber — the intended clients — vehemently deny any involvement in these schemes and have harshly denounced them. The other two Internet security firms whose logos appeared on the proposals — Palantir Technologies and Berico Technologies — both issued statements terminating their relationship with HBGary and insisting that they had nothing to do with these plots. Only Hunton & Williams and its partner, John Woods — the central cogs soliciting these proposals — have steadfastly refused to comment.

Palantir, in particular, has been quite aggressive about trying to distance itself. They initially issued a strong statement denouncing the plots, then had their CEO call me vowing to investigate and terminate any employees who were involved, then issued another statement over the weekend claiming that “Palantir never has and never will condone the sort of activities that HBGary recommended” and “Palantir did not participate in the development of the recommendations that Palantir and others find offensive.” Such vehemence is unsurprising: the Palo-Alto-based firm relies for its recruitment efforts on maintaining a carefully cultivated image as a progressive company devoted to civil liberties, privacy and Internet freedom — all of which would be obviously sullied by involvement in such a scheme.


http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/palantir/



Firm targeting WikiLeaks cuts ties with HBGary - apologizes to reporter
by Steve Ragan - Feb 11 2011, 01:55

~Snip~

Some of the things mentioned as potential proactive tactics against WikiLeaks include feeding the fuel between the feuding groups, disinformation, creating messages around actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization, and submitting fake documents to WikiLeaks and then calling out the error.

“Create concern over the security of the infrastructure. Create exposure stories. If the process is believed to not be secure they are done. Cyber attacks against the infrastructure to get data on document submitters. This would kill the project. Since the servers are now in Sweden and France putting a team together to get access is more straightforward,” the proposal said.

Moreover, reporter Glenn Greenwald, who writes for Salon.com, was singled out in the proposal as a person offering a level of support to WikiLeaks that needed to be disrupted. This disruption would include making Greenwald, and others in similar situations, choose between professional preservation and cause.

Our original coverage on this topic can be viewed here.

On Thursday evening, Dr. Alex Karp sent The Tech Herald a statement on the events and information presented in the story.

“As the Co-Founder and CEO of Palantir Technologies, I have directed the company to sever any and all contacts with HB Gary,” the statement starts...

~Snip~

Full article:

http://www.thetechherald.com/articles/Firm-targeting-WikiLeaks-cuts-ties-with-HBGary-apologizes-to-reporter/12767/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That will not alleviate the delusions of grandeur Snowden is experiencing. n/t Blackford Jul 2013 #1
lol. that strikes me as quite amusing. cali Jul 2013 #2
Not as "amusing" ProSense Jul 2013 #3
and that's related just how? In any case, A chacun son gout. cali Jul 2013 #6
By level of "amusing." ProSense Jul 2013 #9
At the risk of repeating myself: A chacun son gout. Knock yourself out. cali Jul 2013 #15
As amusing as Assange forging a travel document for Snowden? randome Jul 2013 #33
I bet that sent a cold chill down Snowden's spine railsback Jul 2013 #4
did you know the NSA was spying on you before last month upaloopa Jul 2013 #5
I knew the NSA was spying on people since Truman set it up railsback Jul 2013 #13
LOL Scurrilous Jul 2013 #18
LOL. Nice...nt Maximumnegro Jul 2013 #22
I asked if you knew the NSA was spying on you! upaloopa Jul 2013 #23
I suppose you have proof of this railsback Jul 2013 #24
you use email? you use a cell phone upaloopa Jul 2013 #26
Again, proof? railsback Jul 2013 #32
That's no rebuttal upaloopa Jul 2013 #35
Ok, so then no proof railsback Jul 2013 #36
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the ACLU beg to differ with the ambassador. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #7
Well: ProSense Jul 2013 #11
You say tomawto, they say tomato. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #14
And a US Ambassador has more credibility than any NGO. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #30
To you, perhaps. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #37
lol. allin99 Jul 2013 #8
As if the US government's opinion wasn't already clear to everyone. n/t magellan Jul 2013 #10
The grounding of a sovereign leader's plane Aerows Jul 2013 #12
that settles the issue.. when you want to know the truth about something - official statements Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #16
And in another thread railsback Jul 2013 #19
LOL nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #21
Kick! ProSense Jul 2013 #17
Have we killed the messenger yet? HB Gary would love to know.... think Jul 2013 #20
Some of these people think they can get away with any kind of lie flamingdem Jul 2013 #25
Because lies are 'in and there is really no punishment for that. Whisp Jul 2013 #28
By the time she was busted she had the Snowdenistas flamingdem Jul 2013 #29
Lies are 'in'. Shrewd observation. randome Jul 2013 #38
After WikiLeak's teleprompter crack railsback Jul 2013 #27
I checked and they hadn't deleted it flamingdem Jul 2013 #31
I think people are still in shock railsback Jul 2013 #34
Not Norman! Noooo!!! randome Jul 2013 #39
And if she's able to show her call log that the Ambassador did call Savannahmann Jul 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Updated: US ambassador to...»Reply #20