Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

railsback

(1,881 posts)

32. Again, proof?

Reply to upaloopa (Reply #26)

Fri Jul 12, 2013, 01:44 PM

Jul 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Updated: US ambassador to Russia disputes claim sent message to Snowden [View all] ProSense Jul 2013 OP

That will not alleviate the delusions of grandeur Snowden is experiencing. n/t Blackford Jul 2013 #1

lol. that strikes me as quite amusing. cali Jul 2013 #2

Not as "amusing" ProSense Jul 2013 #3

and that's related just how? In any case, A chacun son gout. cali Jul 2013 #6

By level of "amusing." ProSense Jul 2013 #9

At the risk of repeating myself: A chacun son gout. Knock yourself out. cali Jul 2013 #15

As amusing as Assange forging a travel document for Snowden? randome Jul 2013 #33

I bet that sent a cold chill down Snowden's spine railsback Jul 2013 #4

did you know the NSA was spying on you before last month upaloopa Jul 2013 #5

I knew the NSA was spying on people since Truman set it up railsback Jul 2013 #13

LOL Scurrilous Jul 2013 #18

LOL. Nice...nt Maximumnegro Jul 2013 #22

I asked if you knew the NSA was spying on you! upaloopa Jul 2013 #23

I suppose you have proof of this railsback Jul 2013 #24

you use email? you use a cell phone upaloopa Jul 2013 #26

Again, proof? railsback Jul 2013 #32

That's no rebuttal upaloopa Jul 2013 #35

Ok, so then no proof railsback Jul 2013 #36

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the ACLU beg to differ with the ambassador. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #7

Well: ProSense Jul 2013 #11

You say tomawto, they say tomato. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #14

And a US Ambassador has more credibility than any NGO. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #30

To you, perhaps. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #37

lol. allin99 Jul 2013 #8

As if the US government's opinion wasn't already clear to everyone. n/t magellan Jul 2013 #10

The grounding of a sovereign leader's plane Aerows Jul 2013 #12

that settles the issue.. when you want to know the truth about something - official statements Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #16

And in another thread railsback Jul 2013 #19

LOL nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #21

Kick! ProSense Jul 2013 #17

Have we killed the messenger yet? HB Gary would love to know.... think Jul 2013 #20

Some of these people think they can get away with any kind of lie flamingdem Jul 2013 #25

Because lies are 'in and there is really no punishment for that. Whisp Jul 2013 #28

By the time she was busted she had the Snowdenistas flamingdem Jul 2013 #29

Lies are 'in'. Shrewd observation. randome Jul 2013 #38

After WikiLeak's teleprompter crack railsback Jul 2013 #27

I checked and they hadn't deleted it flamingdem Jul 2013 #31

I think people are still in shock railsback Jul 2013 #34

Not Norman! Noooo!!! randome Jul 2013 #39

And if she's able to show her call log that the Ambassador did call Savannahmann Jul 2013 #40