General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Have Trayvon Martin's parents sued Zimmerman in civil court [View all]BronxBoy
(2,287 posts)The statute says that if the person was justified as laid out in the first 3 sections in the 1st section that that person would be immune from both criminal and civil prosecution. We don't have those 3 sections but Mr. Zimmerman did indeed have to face a criminal trial. Did he not meet the criteria laid out in those sections? And if he didn't, why would he then be immune from a civil suit?
I'm curious as to whether the a not guilty verdict at trial is translates into justification.
I get what they were trying to do with this law. If you break into my house and I shoot you why should the victim or their family profit from that. Just seems this law is poorly worded or I'm just missing something. I keep hearing that this law gives blanket immunity to Mr. Zimmerman if he's found not guilty but the law or at least what I've seen of it is absolutely silent on the subject of criminal proceedings.