Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 09:18 PM Jul 2013

Seems like the GZ jury will be looking at the evidence in detail.... [View all]

It's a good sign they asked for what is probably a long exhibit list. There's a lot of evidence. It's good that they are going to take the time to go through it and discuss it, whatever they decide in the end.

I think it may mean their minds are not made up beforehand. We'll see how long they're out. It should take a little while to go through all that evidence...listen to the tapes again, watch videos, read testimony, discuss with each other, argue.

So whether they come out with murder 2 or manslaughter or not guilty, if they've taken their time to go through the evidence, had discussions, and the verdict is unanimous, that lends credence to their verdict.

I don't expect any particular verdict. Juries can surprise us.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seems like the GZ jury wi...