Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it possible Snowden is the opening salvo of Paul 2016? [View all]ucrdem
(15,720 posts)53. Warrants are already required.
Needless to say electronic and phone communications have been the subjects of abundant legislative activity for at least the last couple of decades so I seriously doubt that there's a damn thing such a vaguely worded "law" could or would regulate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
nicely counter balanced by Rand hiring a neo-confederate for his core staff
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#1
The freepers certainly think so. They think they've found the formula, as evidenced by this:
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#4
Doesn't seem to matter that libertarians stand against almost everything else liberals claim to.....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#22
Agreed, but Tea Party is George W. Bush all over again, created explicitely to rebrand Bush/Cheney
Coyotl
Jul 2013
#77
Oh I can see the shit now. If you are against NSA spying then you are with Paul. Epic stupidness.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#29
I dunno. Americans don't really seem to care about the spying and both Pauls have done and said a
BenzoDia
Jul 2013
#12
Well, everybody else has used him. His father initially blamed Wikileaks, but he's since walked....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#23
A very silly idea. Ron Paul is 77 today, so if you really think he is a possibility...
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#15
I'm sorry, but when I read a diatribe like that. "Constitution" this, and "Constitution" that.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#69
Epic refame fail: No! Being pro constitution does not make me a tea bagger. Thanks for playing.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#79
Neh, Libertarians (including the two PAULs *and* SNOWDEN) are IRRELEVANT beings. nt
UTUSN
Jul 2013
#35
The smear and distraction machine is in desperate overdrive, I see.
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#37
heh, that is ironic considering that your op is ridiculous speculation with no basis in fact.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#78
"Support the 4th Amendment." "Defend the Constitution." It's that simplistic to you, right?
randome
Jul 2013
#59
Actually the legal history of 4th amendment cases with respect to electronic communications does not
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#73
I like to listen to CT. I just dont understand how some it accepted and others rejected. This looks
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#43
You stated that "Snowden was possibly the opening salvo". Why is Snowden involved? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#54
If you're saying "will Rand Paul try to use the NSA spying scandal", then, quite possibly
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#80
This will make my suspicions true in this whole Spy and Lie game. The patsy should out the game and
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#44
Breitbat: "Paul leads the pack of potential 2016 GOP candidates in both Iowa and New Hampshire."
ucrdem
Jul 2013
#63
I don't know what's "under your bed", but the "agents" are certainly fond of this place.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#72