Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it possible Snowden is the opening salvo of Paul 2016? [View all]AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)62. I have to be brief.
This isn't about Snowden. It's about the Pauls.
Please read what I've already written because I was on my way out the door a half-hour ago and the folks coming in to remind me of that are becoming a bit cranky.
Have a great weekend. Mine starts ..... now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
nicely counter balanced by Rand hiring a neo-confederate for his core staff
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#1
The freepers certainly think so. They think they've found the formula, as evidenced by this:
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#4
Doesn't seem to matter that libertarians stand against almost everything else liberals claim to.....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#22
Agreed, but Tea Party is George W. Bush all over again, created explicitely to rebrand Bush/Cheney
Coyotl
Jul 2013
#77
Oh I can see the shit now. If you are against NSA spying then you are with Paul. Epic stupidness.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#29
I dunno. Americans don't really seem to care about the spying and both Pauls have done and said a
BenzoDia
Jul 2013
#12
Well, everybody else has used him. His father initially blamed Wikileaks, but he's since walked....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#23
A very silly idea. Ron Paul is 77 today, so if you really think he is a possibility...
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#15
I'm sorry, but when I read a diatribe like that. "Constitution" this, and "Constitution" that.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#69
Epic refame fail: No! Being pro constitution does not make me a tea bagger. Thanks for playing.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#79
Neh, Libertarians (including the two PAULs *and* SNOWDEN) are IRRELEVANT beings. nt
UTUSN
Jul 2013
#35
The smear and distraction machine is in desperate overdrive, I see.
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#37
heh, that is ironic considering that your op is ridiculous speculation with no basis in fact.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#78
"Support the 4th Amendment." "Defend the Constitution." It's that simplistic to you, right?
randome
Jul 2013
#59
Actually the legal history of 4th amendment cases with respect to electronic communications does not
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#73
I like to listen to CT. I just dont understand how some it accepted and others rejected. This looks
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#43
You stated that "Snowden was possibly the opening salvo". Why is Snowden involved? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#54
If you're saying "will Rand Paul try to use the NSA spying scandal", then, quite possibly
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#80
This will make my suspicions true in this whole Spy and Lie game. The patsy should out the game and
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#44
Breitbat: "Paul leads the pack of potential 2016 GOP candidates in both Iowa and New Hampshire."
ucrdem
Jul 2013
#63
I don't know what's "under your bed", but the "agents" are certainly fond of this place.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#72