General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know what is hysterical? [View all]truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)We called it winning hearts and minds. Based on the evidence I would have to say that it is not something the military could or should do.
"Counter-terrorism" as a police action I'm OK with but not if it includes blanket surveillance. There are some things I am not willing to give up, especially since, even in our current state of "war", in this country you have a better chance of being struck by lightning than killed by a terrorist. And I don't attribute that to our friends in the NSA, or the CIA, or the FBI. Ending the "war" would only lengthen the odds imho.
I have traveled a lot, and lived in other countries at various times in my life (like now) and for the most part I don't find the world a scary place. Mostly people just want to live their lives in peace and it is not until their lives become intolerable that they take up arms. I think the best way to radicalize a population is to run roughshod over their beliefs or laws, or to exploit them economically, all for our own (or "our" corporations') selfish purposes.
But I fear we don't really want peace, only compliance, and wealth.