Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

boston bean

(36,930 posts)

24. I you think that I think the jurors are gun humping racists,

Reply to TorchTheWitch (Reply #23)

Sat Jul 13, 2013, 12:21 PM

Jul 2013

You couldn't be more wrong.

The point was knowing what happened with Casey Anthony, they may be a bit more inclined to give the family and victim justice.

I don't think jurors live in bubbles.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About the jurors on the GZ trial [View all] boston bean Jul 2013 OP

the evidence they heard probably outweighed that factor Enrique Jul 2013 #1

I read that they have seen the Jenoch Jul 2013 #2

Me too Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #7

It depends. avebury Jul 2013 #3

How do you get around self defense to convict on manslaughter? dkf Jul 2013 #4

Reasonable doubt is the key. riqster Jul 2013 #5

I think you're misapplying the term Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #14

No: as I said, the judge instructs the jury on how to apply it. riqster Jul 2013 #28

when has conviction ever been based on doubting the accused? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2013 #29

Agreed. And the judge tells the jury how to apply the term. riqster Jul 2013 #32

That part is easy. avebury Jul 2013 #8

A reasonable person would have identified themselves as Neighborhood Watch at some point. targetpractice Jul 2013 #21

True. I forgot that point. Great catch targetpractice! nt avebury Jul 2013 #22

Interesting, The Part You Leave Out, Ma'am.... The Magistrate Jul 2013 #12

Isn't that obvious? What else would the option be? dkf Jul 2013 #19

The Point, Ma'am, Is That You Do Not Include It The Magistrate Jul 2013 #30

easy qazplm Jul 2013 #18

You would make an excellent ChazII Jul 2013 #9

Juror Dynamics... KharmaTrain Jul 2013 #6

Your last line pintobean Jul 2013 #10

I'm concerned about that gun totting juror #6 she could be a sellout bigdarryl Jul 2013 #11

She's taking a lot of notes and the media is predicting itsrobert Jul 2013 #16

She could have formed an opinion and is writing down notes that support her opinion Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #20

And people wonder why pipi_k Jul 2013 #13

Because they hate that dirty so and so... Pelican Jul 2013 #15

Yep, it's always good pipi_k Jul 2013 #17

if they were afraid of being a juror they would have TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #23

I you think that I think the jurors are gun humping racists, boston bean Jul 2013 #24

the Casey Anthony case is no comparison TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #33

All I am trying to say is boston bean Jul 2013 #34

and I still say you're wrongly smearing their characters TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #35

"And I'm not really bothered it" = "I am a dreadful person" cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #25

Great reply. NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #37

I saw on the news a few minutes ago.... chillfactor Jul 2013 #26

I would hope they are. boston bean Jul 2013 #27

On Friday, first thing they asked for was an inventory of evidence. riqster Jul 2013 #31

You're not worried that fear will influence a jury? NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #36