Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Greenwald said vs Reuters summary of what he said: [View all]AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)9. ...

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I posted the original interview. You know the original interview that Reuters cherry picked.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#4
Reuters did not post the entire paragraphs. They cherry picked two sentences
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#17
They did not use ellipses. They did not change the meaning. No context makes Greewald sound rational
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#20
LOL! There is no context that makes the paragraph reasonable. It's not like they used ellipses.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#13
It is crazy. It's also interesting to see how angry so many DUers have become these days.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#28
Greenwald's flaming out. All the King's Horses and All the King's Men can't fix this.
MjolnirTime
Jul 2013
#26
he gave the chinese the IP addresses of us hack targets and specific information as to which
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#48
He deserves a medal for exposing the trashing of the Constitution by our own government.
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#57
That's not the point. No matter what revenge our government may exact on Snowden,
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#61
He didn't reveal how only the fact that we hacked CIVILIAN computer systems...
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#51
Thank you. I was starting to translate this article when I got interrupted by some
Cleita
Jul 2013
#32
Here is what I don't get. Doesn't such a pronouncement make Mr. Snowden less safe?
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#43
Thanks for taking time. It's been unbelievable watching the smear machine at work n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#46
Of course it is a threat. It's conditional... kill me and I will harm you.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#54
The Reuters article did not make it clear that the threat was conditional.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#63
No, it is "kill me and I will harm the US." So anyone wanting to harm the US just has to kill him
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#60
As already revealed, he has info on other countries complicity with surveillance...
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#64