Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bobduca

(1,763 posts)

11. so the letter to the jury re: disregarding all of that testimony

Reply to Riftaxe (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 14, 2013, 12:00 AM

Jul 2013

was that the judge basing his instructions on precedent? or his personal choice base on his reading of the case?

please explain why the jury had such specific instructions.. and why if the prosecution was so seemingly inept that this should be celebrated as "justice"

Also do you own a gun?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yanno . . . no matter how much you want it to be so, America is NOT post racial. [View all] Stinky The Clown Jul 2013 OP

those who ever claimed that were blind bobduca Jul 2013 #1

He only won because of the FUCKING NRA. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #2

And your boogeyman has exactly what Riftaxe Jul 2013 #6

I see that a gungeonite crawled out of the cesspool to comment in DU... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #9

Yet you dodge the question Riftaxe Jul 2013 #13

And yet you are missing the entire reason why this whole thing ever happened. madinmaryland Jul 2013 #16

It is a just verdict Riftaxe Jul 2013 #3

thanks 'teach for the "civics" lesson bobduca Jul 2013 #4

Aye knowing how the 3 branches work Riftaxe Jul 2013 #8

so the letter to the jury re: disregarding all of that testimony bobduca Jul 2013 #11

Maybe, if you are a democrat, you would be fighting against the laws that the NRA madinmaryland Jul 2013 #12

and yet the NRA was no where in the trial Riftaxe Jul 2013 #14

My friend. It was the NRA that created the laws that forced the jury to have to acquit the murderer madinmaryland Jul 2013 #18

This is an uninformed statement uponit7771 Jul 2013 #36

Lord seek help Riftaxe Jul 2013 #17

The NRA forced upon the state of Florida the "stand-your-ground" law. PERIOD. Rather than saying I madinmaryland Jul 2013 #20

The NRA needs to fuck-off, and here... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #21

You do realize Riftaxe Jul 2013 #30

You do realize madinmaryland Jul 2013 #32

Lord yet not one prosecutor or defense attorney was intelligent enough Riftaxe Jul 2013 #33

Huh? Have you understood at all that I am arguing against the law that the madinmaryland Jul 2013 #34

don't you understand, madinmaryland? Skittles Jul 2013 #35

How do you figure? treestar Jul 2013 #10

Because as the law plainly states Riftaxe Jul 2013 #15

BECAUSE as the law plainly states and was written by the NRA... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #22

I suspect you truly believe that Riftaxe Jul 2013 #23

You have yet to refute my assertion and that of most people in this country that the madinmaryland Jul 2013 #24

I do not find the laws absurd Riftaxe Jul 2013 #26

Thanks for actually addressing the points that I made... madinmaryland Jul 2013 #29

I figure it came down to the instruction about the burden of proof treestar Jul 2013 #28

more like the 50s I have in laws now who are openly racist dembotoz Jul 2013 #5

It really is De-Evolution. enigmatic Jul 2013 #7

And who thought this?????? mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #19

Whoever said it was? Iggo Jul 2013 #25

Usually it's the racists who say we're in "post-racial" America Nevernose Jul 2013 #31

No, it certainly isn't. Igel Jul 2013 #27