Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]SheilaT
(23,156 posts)16. Good example there,
70 years old and got married at 20. And I'm not being sarcastic at all. The very vast majority of women do change their surname at marriage, and even though I personally didn't do that, and personally consider it a very strange thing to do, I recognize that my opinion is the odd one.
Makes me wonder how people in the witness protection program manage.
I agree with the sentiment that this is a totally outrageous thing to require. It's part and parcel of the whole war on women: women can't be trusted to make decisions about their body, women can't even be trusted that they have the last name they say they have.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So... FL is denying ID to women? And requires ID to vote? How is this not a civil rights violation?
politicat
Jul 2013
#15
The pre-14th amendment view of governance. No citizenship unless you are white, male, etc.
freshwest
Jul 2013
#18
This is more about women changing their name when married (and immigrants) than FL law
kdmorris
Jul 2013
#31
A woman can keep her name for business and legal purposes, and use her husband's name socially
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#34