Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I couldn't understand how those jurors could not grasp how all the inconsistencies, the comments [View all]GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)3. In America ...
Money can buy anything. Justice be damned.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I couldn't understand how those jurors could not grasp how all the inconsistencies, the comments [View all]
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
OP
I believe all his lies prove that it was not self defene. Why say you were banged 25 times
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#20
the problem in interpreting jury decisions is figuring out what they thought "reasonable doubt" was
unblock
Jul 2013
#7
I don't think he was a brillian criminal either. But I also think the jury could not follow the
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#21
i don't think a black, armed accused person would even bother trying that story with a white victim.
unblock
Jul 2013
#37
And I don't think the prosecution thought about how conservativeness and racism
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#27
If our legal system is skewed to err on the side of not convicting people why do we convict
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#29
I think that juries watch too much TV and have no idea what "reasonable" doubt means
Horse with no Name
Jul 2013
#25
See you and everyone who says the prosecution dropped the ball also can see clearly
Maraya1969
Jul 2013
#33