Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So suppose a woman is walking alone along a dark road. [View all]mbperrin
(7,672 posts)39. He had 2 band aids on his head and never went to the hospital.
In court, the "wounds" were called insubstantial.
In reality, they were scratches, and no DNA was found under TM's fingernails, so George likely did it himself.
I've had worse lifting my head up under a cabinet.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I won't say "only" if the person is black but it's way more likely if the person is black.
live love laugh
Jul 2013
#127
Unlike reasonable states, a self defense claim does not have to be demonstrated by the defense
Blackford
Jul 2013
#5
TM had Z pinned and Z could not retreat according to eye witness testimony (John Good)
dkf
Jul 2013
#7
And the rapist in this hypothetical story is blinded and in extreme pain from being maced.
DanTex
Jul 2013
#8
This the first time I have heard that Travon had injury to his knuckles. Please verify.
olegramps
Jul 2013
#71
The man would be convicted of murder in a heartbeat, under the SAME LAWS that acquitted Zimmerman
cthulu2016
Jul 2013
#10
I think if you claim self-defense, the burden of proof should shift, at least somewhat.
DanTex
Jul 2013
#26
Lack of evidence was indeed the issue, but that was almost wholly caused by the PD's
Nay
Jul 2013
#134
Was she wearing a "menacing" black hoodie and holding a can of ice tea in a "threatening" manner? nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#21
Well if something "good" comes out of this, at least it's waking people up to just how far the NRA
DanTex
Jul 2013
#33
this law in florida removes any burden, they just have to say 'I was afraid for my life'
pasto76
Jul 2013
#36
Wow. Not often that a lawyer publicly reveals himself to be a walking malpractice case
onenote
Jul 2013
#87
If someone fights you in self defense you can kill them and the law says YOU exercised self defense.
Kablooie
Jul 2013
#55
Good luck proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the rapist grabbed the woman first.
DanTex
Jul 2013
#60
Really? Evidence of who grabbed who first? Like some form of short-term carbon dating?
DanTex
Jul 2013
#81
The result would be different if the burden of proof shifted when claiming an affirmative defense.
DanTex
Jul 2013
#89
Neither did I, but from what I've seen/read, I can't really argue that there wasn't reasonable doubt
DanTex
Jul 2013
#101
Uh, white woman here, in the know all along. I have been thinking today that we are all at greater
WCLinolVir
Jul 2013
#105
Silly. You left out the physical evidence that the woman had beaten up the tiny boy....
Honeycombe8
Jul 2013
#77
Moral of the story-If you are being attacked and have an advantage follow through.
WCLinolVir
Jul 2013
#104
Yes they could, but wasn't that the point of your story? I could feasibly do the same. No witness,
WCLinolVir
Jul 2013
#109