Milwaukee: Pair of men with concealed-carry permits engage in shootout

[friendly_iconoclast]

50. "You all repeatedly argue that CCW holders are more responsible and law abiding...

...tha(n) the general public." Because it's true, whether you like it or not- and that GSC
post you linked to demonstrates it:

Texas keeps and publishes those stats. http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/RSD/CHL/Reports/ConvictionRatesReport2011.pdf

For the year 2011:
Crime------------------------------------Total Convictions----CHL Holder Convictions---------------CHL Holder Percentage of Total
Agg Assault W/ Deadly Weapon-------------2,765---------------3------------------------------------0.1085%
Deadly Conduct (Includes non-fierarm)----1,353----------------9------------------------------------0.6652%
Deadly Conduct, Discharge Firearm-----------244----------------2-----------------------------------0.8197%

In 2011 there were 518,625 CHL holders. 2012 had 584,850.

As you can see there are a lot of us that have CHLs, but the offenders in that type of crime are in the single digits. None of them rise to 1% of the convictions. That is a far cry for your claimed 480% difference.

SYG & homicides. You assume that all homicides are wrong. Yes, SYG does lead to an increase in JUSTIFIED homices. That is to be expected. Criminals are more likely to suffer catastrophic failure of their victim selection program resulting inpermenant total system shutdown for the criminal. You slant the statement by omitting the word "justified"

Gee, not only are they safer to be around than the police, they're safer to be around than the public at large
(And no, 'moral harm' does not count)

Despite all your assertions to the contrary, no one denies CCW holders like the two idjits in the OP and
George Zimmerman exist- there's just not that many of them, and nowhere near the numbers you've claimed