Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden Stuck It to the Overclass - For All of Us [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)15. CIA forerunner agency was OSS -- Oh So Social!
From Kangas:
Besides creating foundations, the CIA helped organize the business community. There have always been special interest groups representing business, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, and the CIA has long been involved with them. However, after 1973, a spate of powerful new groups would come into existence, like the Business Roundtable and the Trilateral Commission. These organizations quickly became powerhouses in promoting the business agenda.
Their efforts clearly succeeded. With the 1975 SUN-PAC decision, corporations persuaded government to legalize corporate Political Action Committees (the lobbyist organizations that bribe our government). By 1992, corporations formed 67 percent of all PACs, and they donated 79 percent of all campaign contributions to political parties. (20) In two landmark elections 1980 and 1994 corporations gave heavily and one-sidedly to Republicans, turning one or both houses of Congress over to the GOP. Democratic incumbents were shocked by the threat of being rolled completely out of power, so they quietly shifted to the right on economic issues, even though they continued a public façade of liberalism. Corporations went ahead and donated to Democratic incumbents in all other elections, but only as long as they abandoned the interests of workers, consumers, minorities and the poor. As expected, the new pro-corporate Congress passed laws favoring the rich: between 1975 and 1992, the amount of national household wealth owned by the richest 1 percent soared from 22 to 42 percent. (21)
The CIA also helped create the conservative think tank movement. Prior to the 70s, think tanks spanned the political spectrum, with moderate think tanks receiving three times as much funding as conservative ones. At these early think tanks, scholars typically brainstormed for creative solutions to policy problems. This would all change after the rise of conservative foundations in the early 70s. The Heritage Foundation opened its doors in 1973, the recipient of $250,000 in seed money from the Coors Foundation. A flood of conservative think tanks followed shortly thereafter, and by 1980 they overwhelmed the scene. The new think tanks turned out to be little more than propaganda mills, rigging studies to "prove" that their corporate sponsors needed tax breaks, deregulation and other favors from government.
Of course, think-tank studies are useless without publicity, and here the CIA proved especially valuable. Using propaganda techniques it had perfected at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, the CIA and its allies turned American AM radio into a haven for conservative talk show hosts. Yes Rush Limbaugh uses the same propaganda techniques that Muscovites once heard from Voice of America. The CIA has also developed countless other media outlets, like Capital Cities (which eventually bought ABC), major PR firms like Hill & Knowlton, and of course, all the Agencys connections in the national news media. (22)
And some wonder why Rush Limbaugh got a microphone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK, I'm going to say that I think your tactics are a bit underhanded (without
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#37
I'm only going by what Der Speigel says. However, you can't believe everything you read.
randome
Jul 2013
#43
Nearly every criminal pleads 'Innocent'. He stole documents and he is wanted by the authorities.
randome
Jul 2013
#85
Several whistleblowers have testified that they could pull information on anyone's phone numbers.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#81
That they collect the metadata is enough to permit them to tag anyone who dissens in any way.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#94
It's not likely that anyone at the installation in Hawaii could access the domestic metadata.
bornskeptic
Jul 2013
#121
The courts have never considered this kind of mass collection of metadata including metadata
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#93
FYI: It's 'rentier' (not 'renter'), a term borrowed from the classical economics of
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#59
Again, what specific evidence do you need to be persuaded, and which claims does he not
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#78
See my Post #81 for an explanation. The evidence he has given us is enough if you have the
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#82
What evidence do you need? Specifically, what evidence would you need to believe his claims?
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#68
Could I have a link on the death of Steve Kangas along with any evidence that Scaife had him rubbed
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#4
If it is speculation, boy is it hilarious that in the same sentence that you make your unfounded
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#7
I open my mind to evidence; if you have any, I'll happily read it. If you don't have any,
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#12
And let us not forget the Powell Memorandum that kicked the whole thing off.
GliderGuider
Jul 2013
#31
"whoa dude we need a revolution against the machine but right now i got a badass case of munchies"
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#60
very probably not. kangas died in 1999. much of the stuff he mentions in his
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#120
I lived in Pennsylvania for much of the 80s and in my circles everybody knew Scaife was a dirtbag
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#129