Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Its pretty embarassing actually naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #1
This. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2013 #24
What was Trayvon ever accused of? ananda Jul 2013 #73
I didn't say he was accused of anything. Nt naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #78
Zimmerman accused him of being suspiciously black Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #86
Nonsense.. No one is advocating against true "self defense" hlthe2b Jul 2013 #2
Is that what I said? Bake Jul 2013 #12
Your call out of DUers who disagree with you on the verdict and your egregious mischaracerization hlthe2b Jul 2013 #17
Thank you. No one is suggesting the things stated in the OP. n/t Dawgs Jul 2013 #64
+1 OP is swinging at straw men woolldog Jul 2013 #74
double standards are funny things hfojvt Jul 2013 #129
No, indeed, that DUer did not mischaracterize what other DUers said. hlthe2b Jul 2013 #136
Yes, it is what you said muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #79
You may not look for trouble, but that doesn't stop the Zimmermans Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #88
Actually, you said that you believe a rapist has the right to murder your wife. reusrename Jul 2013 #118
+1 Hangingon Jul 2013 #3
Broad Brush there.... trumad Jul 2013 #4
Are you nuts? Bake Jul 2013 #18
+2, premium Jul 2013 #5
Also, to unfairly broadbrush other DU members based upon differences of opinions, & get away with it NYC_SKP Jul 2013 #6
Then you weren't paying attention Bake Jul 2013 #25
The jury system dates back to Magna Carta. Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #7
Lost it's mind? You just now noticed? hobbit709 Jul 2013 #8
No, I waited until now to post. Bake Jul 2013 #27
And the boycott calls are insane ksoze Jul 2013 #9
Minority teenage issues?? Is that what you call murdering a kid? Talk about dismissive. WCLinolVir Jul 2013 #61
Chill out mind reader ksoze Jul 2013 #99
and federal civil rights prosecution would be double joepardy markiv Jul 2013 #10
Federal prosecution would not be double jeopardy--different sovereign entity. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #16
i know of no case where the state tried someone for something substantial markiv Jul 2013 #20
Your ignorance is not a defense against history. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #26
do you believe the state failed to prosecute this case markiv Jul 2013 #30
Doesn't matter, feds can always step in if there's a violation of federal criminal law. nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #31
yes it does matter, what people are asking them to do, is double jeopardy, in spirit markiv Jul 2013 #35
So now you're talking lofty principles instead of the law nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #37
double jeopardy is more than just a 'lofty principal' markiv Jul 2013 #43
I just proved to you that there is no right against federal prosecutions geek tragedy Jul 2013 #48
perception is reality markiv Jul 2013 #56
You are wrong ceonupe Jul 2013 #114
fbi report Niceguy1 Jul 2013 #128
Yep ceonupe Jul 2013 #143
Wasn't that the case with the Rodney King police officers?? RockaFowler Jul 2013 #140
They were different charges anomiep Jul 2013 #47
Every federal charge is different from the state charge, since geek tragedy Jul 2013 #51
Well anomiep Jul 2013 #82
Try the Rodney King & Danziger Bridge cases..... Little Star Jul 2013 #45
A consideration of facts is going to slow things down. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #65
this case is precisely why the feds have to step in noiretextatique Jul 2013 #50
All of that has nothing to do with what happened in the Zimmerman trial... Pelican Jul 2013 #68
THE EVIDENCE IS AMERICAN HISTORY noiretextatique Jul 2013 #104
What are you talking about? Pelican Jul 2013 #107
Yep! Little Star Jul 2013 #69
The burden of proof is even harder in a Federal civil rights charge hack89 Jul 2013 #80
i don't think so noiretextatique Jul 2013 #105
It was not prominent in the trial hack89 Jul 2013 #110
i am not sure why they didn't noiretextatique Jul 2013 #113
Claims =/= proof hack89 Jul 2013 #119
how do you prove someone is racist? noiretextatique Jul 2013 #123
I can think of several hack89 Jul 2013 #124
No one lost their minds. mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #11
She won't "brandish." Bake Jul 2013 #33
she will shoot mstinamotorcity2 Jul 2013 #39
Right...and the dead person will never be able to tell his/her side. Atman Jul 2013 #49
I just read the law and you're absolutely right Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #92
And if its reasonable. You're damn right Bake Jul 2013 #52
If there was ever a case for expressed outrage, this is it... Yet those who can not understand that. hlthe2b Jul 2013 #55
So, "speaking out of frustration" excuses crazy talk? Silent3 Jul 2013 #81
Interesting, where were these posts because I never saw them Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #13
Then you missed it. All of it. Bake Jul 2013 #36
Maybe I did, I guess I just don't click on those posts Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #60
so did you comment on THOSE threads instead of making this all about you? Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #93
If you honestly think this case boils down to someone is dead, therefore Z was guilty, stranger81 Jul 2013 #94
The Florida rule is that a man can try to rape a woman, and if she fights back geek tragedy Jul 2013 #14
No, it is not Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #22
Imagine if Trayvon Martin were a 19 year old young black woman geek tragedy Jul 2013 #29
I agree for the most part but take a look at this case Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #34
I am familiar with that case Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #62
Not even close Bake Jul 2013 #40
If she's armed. If he's armed and she's not, well then he's the geek tragedy Jul 2013 #41
if she shot him she would have been charged and convicted JI7 Jul 2013 #130
If AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #71
Wow! And it is so nice of you to share you and your wife's guilt-free willingness jmg257 Jul 2013 #91
That's why I stayed away from DU yesterday. . . DinahMoeHum Jul 2013 #15
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #21
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #42
You might want to change the "you're an idiot" part. Dawgs Jul 2013 #67
I guess I'm "more sensitive than yourself". And 5 jurors agreed with me. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #77
Good. Dawgs Jul 2013 #95
That was satire, right??? DinahMoeHum Jul 2013 #96
People are just venting... Punkingal Jul 2013 #19
Sometimes. Igel Jul 2013 #133
thank goodness Puzzledtraveller Jul 2013 #23
I must plead 'mea culpa' to at least flirting with the first particular ('Eliminate the HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #28
I never said eliminate self-defense laws, I said revise Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #32
where's batman? datasuspect Jul 2013 #38
And in the wake of big stories, this is different for DU how? Lex Jul 2013 #44
Don't forget eliminate Florida Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #46
You said it Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #53
If your wife resists the attack Turbineguy Jul 2013 #54
She'll need to enroll in "sniper" training post haste!... hlthe2b Jul 2013 #57
!!! Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #72
What's that? People say things when they get pissed? Scootaloo Jul 2013 #58
I accept the jury's decision over trial-by-media. Dash87 Jul 2013 #59
Not me, the verdict was predictable given the prosecution's Beacool Jul 2013 #63
DU always loses its mind over issues like this bigwillq Jul 2013 #66
I believe it would be better for 100 men to go without guns, than one innocent boy be shot. onehandle Jul 2013 #70
Don't forget the elimination of the freedom from illegal search and seizure Android3.14 Jul 2013 #75
I have too! Fear makes cowards of us all. Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #97
Are you allowed to say this? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #76
The FL law is absurd, as a juror I would have ignored the law Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #83
Don't wait on a pizza line in St. Pete HockeyMom Jul 2013 #87
Vigilante ville - Disney's latest theme park: long lines, heat, humidity, and guns. Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #100
Disney big fight with State of Florida HockeyMom Jul 2013 #120
A zone of sanity in a swamp full of gators Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #131
Irrational fear for something that has not happened HockeyMom Jul 2013 #84
+1 n/t IL Lib Jul 2013 #142
People are so upset because, although we live in the avebury Jul 2013 #85
Eliminate injustice, mzmolly Jul 2013 #89
Being armed is not assurance of the ability to get and use the weapon. Bundy, e.g., incapaci- WinkyDink Jul 2013 #90
When we all know the jury was wrong crim son Jul 2013 #98
The law was wrong ... The jury was weak Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #101
Forget it... Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #103
hi, GUN NUT!! Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #102
Agree, I used to say it re: the OJ case too treestar Jul 2013 #106
all I know is G_j Jul 2013 #108
Um...someone needs to put down the pipe Rex Jul 2013 #109
I don't think you want that stuff. DevonRex Jul 2013 #122
Unarmed and unharmed over 62 years DainBramaged Jul 2013 #111
And I avoided becoming a statistic Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #116
Bravado, you have it DainBramaged Jul 2013 #117
That is what you think keeps you from being a statistic. Rex Jul 2013 #126
Only partially true Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #132
You feel empowered by that particular situation because Rex Jul 2013 #134
Your opinion Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #135
That part is true, few criminals are shot by law abiding citizens. Rex Jul 2013 #139
Interesting page Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #141
Yes. This happens EVERY time some perceived injustice occurs. closeupready Jul 2013 #112
Nope. Just turns out DUers are human. Orsino Jul 2013 #115
The jury didn't get it a little wrong, they got it disastrously wrong. Nine Jul 2013 #121
Few are making those absurd claims.. DCBob Jul 2013 #125
I think if this country had less fearful gun humpers roaming around in public SirRevolutionary Jul 2013 #127
Your wife's being armed does not guarantee a rapist or attempted rapist will suffer the consequence Iris Jul 2013 #137
DU has been doing that a lot lately. n/t pnwmom Jul 2013 #138
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU lost its mind after th...»Reply #111