Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden Stuck It to the Overclass - For All of Us [View all]sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)73. There should be no camps.
Snowden is either a legitimate whistle blower or he is not. So, long as the government hunts him as public enemy #1 there will be no chance of finding out. He should be invited home under immunity as an asylum seeker to testify before Congress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK, I'm going to say that I think your tactics are a bit underhanded (without
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#37
I'm only going by what Der Speigel says. However, you can't believe everything you read.
randome
Jul 2013
#43
Nearly every criminal pleads 'Innocent'. He stole documents and he is wanted by the authorities.
randome
Jul 2013
#85
Several whistleblowers have testified that they could pull information on anyone's phone numbers.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#81
That they collect the metadata is enough to permit them to tag anyone who dissens in any way.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#94
It's not likely that anyone at the installation in Hawaii could access the domestic metadata.
bornskeptic
Jul 2013
#121
The courts have never considered this kind of mass collection of metadata including metadata
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#93
FYI: It's 'rentier' (not 'renter'), a term borrowed from the classical economics of
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#59
Again, what specific evidence do you need to be persuaded, and which claims does he not
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#78
See my Post #81 for an explanation. The evidence he has given us is enough if you have the
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#82
What evidence do you need? Specifically, what evidence would you need to believe his claims?
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#68
Could I have a link on the death of Steve Kangas along with any evidence that Scaife had him rubbed
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#4
If it is speculation, boy is it hilarious that in the same sentence that you make your unfounded
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#7
I open my mind to evidence; if you have any, I'll happily read it. If you don't have any,
el_bryanto
Jul 2013
#12
And let us not forget the Powell Memorandum that kicked the whole thing off.
GliderGuider
Jul 2013
#31
"whoa dude we need a revolution against the machine but right now i got a badass case of munchies"
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#60
very probably not. kangas died in 1999. much of the stuff he mentions in his
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#120
I lived in Pennsylvania for much of the 80s and in my circles everybody knew Scaife was a dirtbag
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#129