Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Journeyman

(15,458 posts)
8. I saw a report on "60 Minutes" maybe 30 years ago on protective equipment for football. . .
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 06:55 PM
Jul 2013

the designer in that story had developed some potentially useful advances, including a seat-belt type strap that connected the helmet to the shoulder pads, to hold the head more rigid during play. But when asked if these advances would make the game safer, he told Mike Wallace that though they had the potential to do so, the problem is that every time football players are made safer they just hit each other harder.

Don't get me wrong: I'm all in favor of anything that protects the players. But as with everything in life, there are trade offs to safety. . .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Woodpecker inspires cardb...»Reply #8