Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Everyone that is congratulating the jurors for following the Judge's instructions... psssst, c'mer [View all]Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)6. BULLSHIT! STOP CALLING ME A LIAR.
After you check your FACTS, please come back and post an apology.
ETA: just in case you return and delete your post, I'm going to copy it here for all to see:
That is not what he asked
Stop lying and adding on.
He asked was who was most believable of the witnesses. He did not aske that specific question and you know it.
STOP IT!
The judge ordered the juror to disregard 1 statement by him not his whole testimony which by the way was hurtful to the states case. Lots of what he said was not thrown out.
Oh and the state waited till the next day to object.
Stop lying and adding on.
He asked was who was most believable of the witnesses. He did not aske that specific question and you know it.
STOP IT!
The judge ordered the juror to disregard 1 statement by him not his whole testimony which by the way was hurtful to the states case. Lots of what he said was not thrown out.
Oh and the state waited till the next day to object.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Everyone that is congratulating the jurors for following the Judge's instructions... psssst, c'mer [View all]
Duer 157099
Jul 2013
OP
Yup. Lest you forget it was a state's atty who called and said not to charge him. nt
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#60
It always is, imo, when the jury is told to disregard something they have already seen...
Spazito
Jul 2013
#37
Yes, I have no doubt O'Mara knew and also knew the question was completely inappropriate...
Spazito
Jul 2013
#54
That particular quality is in such short supply these days. You just gave me hope for huimanity :)
arcane1
Jul 2013
#29
So...they didn't base the verdict on evidence. The verdict was based on a guy's opinion.
Apophis
Jul 2013
#8
move along. Nothing to see here. the sidewalk is a lethal weapon so it was self defense.
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#59