Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are males and females 50%-50%? [View all]TexasProgresive
(12,733 posts)26. This from an earlier post of mine
The chart in the link does not reflect birth or conception ratios but starts with an equal number 100,000. The males start declining immediately which increases at adolescence.
At birth there is a higher percentage of males to females. This starts shifting right from the beginning. The link is to an actuarial life table that shows the chance of dying in each year of birth. for males it begins higher and becomes radically higher in the teens. That would be from risky behavior but the death rates for males remain higher until the unrealistic age of 116.
There could be any number of factors as to why. Here some possibilities:
1) There is an inherent weakness in the male that leads to early death.
2) It takes fewer males to propagate the species.
3) Males more likely to engage in risky behavior.
3) Longer living females ensure offspring growing to adulthood.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html
There could be any number of factors as to why. Here some possibilities:
1) There is an inherent weakness in the male that leads to early death.
2) It takes fewer males to propagate the species.
3) Males more likely to engage in risky behavior.
3) Longer living females ensure offspring growing to adulthood.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The ratio of boys to girls at birth ranges from 1.03 to 1.07 generally, depending on country
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#4
Assume there is such a thing as truly random, then random coin flips are 50% heads 50% tails.
retread
Feb 2012
#9
It's probably more complex than that, particularly in species which are polygynous and bear litters
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#20
It seems unlikely to me that a bottle-neck would lead to a change in species mating-systems
HereSince1628
Feb 2012
#22