Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demoiselle

(6,787 posts)
4. You're right.
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 09:22 PM
Jul 2013

Men and women often do approach things differently, and I think the differences help clarify issues in a discussion. I've had one experience as a juror on a pretty serious criminal case, and I liked the way we worked together, men and women. We also had tremendous variety of professions/occupations/formal education levels on that jury, and I think it made us very good as a thinking group. There were also twelve of us...a much better number than six, imo.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And no way should it be 6 women quinnox Jul 2013 #1
You're right. Demoiselle Jul 2013 #4
Neat observations quinnox Jul 2013 #8
There are studies that show men and women look at things differently davidn3600 Jul 2013 #11
exactly, I agree completely quinnox Jul 2013 #13
How about 6 judges, instead of 6 bias, cluless citizens?? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #2
So just throw away a system that dates back to Magna Carta? Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #3
Jurors have been wrong way too many times. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #5
Do you realize how difficult it is to ammend the constitution? Travis_0004 Jul 2013 #7
Yeeps. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #10
Why have more jurors? TheLion Jul 2013 #6
So do I. Igel Jul 2013 #9
Amen treestar Jul 2013 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think juries should hav...»Reply #4