Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Zimmerman juror WITHDRAWS from writing book now.. [View all]The decision was made for you lady.
Making money off of this for anybody but travons family is going to be toxic.
I am thankful she gave what appeared to be an honest interview before the professional image people shaped her story.
She was totally blind to the fact her life was far different than travons or even George's last 5 years or so. Her interview will add great value to those who analyze this case.
Best belive if any other juror gives an interview it will be sanitized and made PC and not be the truth.
The truth is sometimes ugly and uncomfortable. Given her background I am not surprised she reached that conclusion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Good catch...she sounds as though she had her mind up before she heard all the evidence..
HipChick
Jul 2013
#15
her husband was friends with the defense lawyer? how did she ever get on that jury?
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#4
No report of that. I think it was intended as a joke by the person who wrote the OP.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#47
if it was substantiated maybe they could call a mistrial, and retry the case with a better
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#25
But, if it turns out that that jury compromised by the fact that her husband & OMara
Ecumenist
Jul 2013
#32
In some states, that's considered jury tampering, which can result in a new trial.
politicat
Jul 2013
#33
that's probably right on the mistrial, i keep forgetting that zimmy is the defendant. but if
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#35
+1. "her husband's perspective" would seem to support the rumor that he's an attorney.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#34
Looks like he has been identified an attorney who has been on CNN talking to Nancy Grace
HipChick
Jul 2013
#52