General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mr. President, many of us thought we were voting for greatness. Instead, we got you. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)You don't, apparently, understand what "attacking people" is all about.
Having a different view from yours is not an "attack."
Not agreeing with a statement is not an "attack."
I'd say you're terribly hard to please, too, if he has not met even your "MINIMUM needs." Gee, how have you survived all these years?
The GOP will associate OCCUPY with Obama, whether you like it, or not. No matter what they do, no matter how much they insist that the movement is apolitical, as far as the GOP is concerned, they're working for Barack. So, you can go on all you'd like, but that's the bottom line as far as they are concerned. Do with that fact what you will.
As for the President, he has work to do--expecting him to sign "petitions" like he's been approached upon coming out of a supermarket is just a naive expectation on your part. He's the President of all the people, not a wish granter, not a King.
I think there's just no pleasing some people, and you are proudly standing with that group. I will make a prediction that I think will materialize for you in the future--you're probably not going to be any happier with Obama in his second term, and I'll wager there will never be a sitting President who will make you very happy, or even meet your "MINIMUM needs."
That's life.