that out because of how passively they acted towards proving their case. It looked like a great big love fest with O'Mara and the Defense. Like I said, I wouldn't have called Detective Serino nor John Good as prosecution witnesses. I would have went after both, and I definately would have went after John Good, the same way the defense went after Jenteal about his testimony and what he really saw. They talked about Crump but what about Good and Serino. I wouldn't have accepted his explanation about clarifying anything. He changed his testimony, no different than Jenteal, to strenghten the self defense theme for Zimmerman. Just who suggested MMA or ground pound, Serino or Good? I would have broke both of them down. Good is the only witness, claiming Martin was beating Zimmerman to death and Zimmerman was calling for help. He saw and heard all that without any lights. There wasn't light enough for anybodyelse to see that.
If he was that close and saw all those details, then why did he run in the House to call 911 instead of helping Zimmerman when he asked him? That made no sense, especially when Zimmerman claims it was too dark to see Martin jump him. That means Good had even better vision than Zimmerman from a further distance on the porch. Zimmerman told his ex police friend that he made eye contact with Good when he told him to help too. I would say they both would have a problem with me, trying to get their stories to fit. Serino also gives me a problem with some things he claims to put the story together. And another point too in that testimony. Zimmerman never said Good told them to stop and Good's voice never came up on any of the other 911 calls or even him being seen by other witnesses in the vicinity.
= new reply since forum marked as read