Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
2. Not sought after, agreed...
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 12:23 PM
Jul 2013

...but once called the potential juror has options. One is being brutally honest about your beliefs. If you think you may have racist tendencies ('person of color' is a red flag, imo) you should say so. Would someone with racist/bigoted tendencies state those traits? Probably not. Some may even go to extremes to hide those traits in order to 'do some good' (take that as you will...protect the non 'person of color' or convict the 'person of color').

Jurors, once seated, do not magically grow halos. They're human beings just like the rest of us. They can still lie, stretch the truth, obfuscate, etc. There have been random jurors in the past that have absolutely relished the spotlight. Others, quite the opposite.

If you sign a book deal within days of a verdict, I'd say you're the type to grab onto the brightest spotlight available.

I'm not the type to 'trash' anyone, but I will always question a person's motives. As far as the rest of the jurors, I couldn't give you an opinion. I do know that when they were first chosen and I read the bios I said out loud "WTF?".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jury duty is a requiremen...»Reply #2