Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Two women attack McDonalds employee---turned out to be a big mistake. [View all]savalez
(3,517 posts)30. The co-worker had the best vantage point
and he is clearly heard telling the guy to stop; and he did stop. Good.
they were the ones who made it physical, they were the one who chased after the employee. He was the one who remained calm. He was the one who retreated. He was the one who eventually had to defend himself.
Um, okay. So? Are you answering for the poster that I asked if he should have kept hitting them until the died? Is that your opinion? Hit them until they die?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why impose your tripe when it offers NOTHING to the thread, other than to impose?
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#26
I'm far more inclined to trust the attacked employer as to when he felt he was no longer in danger.
EOTE
Jul 2013
#34
Maybe it was truly excessive force (in that it was more than needed to neutralize the threat).
EOTE
Jul 2013
#66
I don't fault the employee for the initial whacks, but after they were on the ground
penultimate
Jul 2013
#58