Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Two women attack McDonalds employee---turned out to be a big mistake. [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)32. I was responding to your question, this really isn't all that difficult.
And it's really easy for the coworker to say that, he wasn't the one being assaulted. And I've answered your question already, he should have continued until he felt they were no longer a threat. And after their animalistic behavior, I'm far more inclined to believe him rather than them as to when that point was. And apparently juries agree with me as they acquitted the employee and convicted those two dumbass girls.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why impose your tripe when it offers NOTHING to the thread, other than to impose?
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#26
I'm far more inclined to trust the attacked employer as to when he felt he was no longer in danger.
EOTE
Jul 2013
#34
Maybe it was truly excessive force (in that it was more than needed to neutralize the threat).
EOTE
Jul 2013
#66
I don't fault the employee for the initial whacks, but after they were on the ground
penultimate
Jul 2013
#58