Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Two women attack McDonalds employee---turned out to be a big mistake. [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)66. Maybe it was truly excessive force (in that it was more than needed to neutralize the threat).
But in a case like that, I'm going to be DAMNED sure the threat is neutralized before I stop attacking. Especially when the one who provoked the attack clearly cared so little about my own safety. If he had started attacking once she slapped him, I'd say he had very little standing. But once they jumped the counter and started chasing him, all bets are off. That's psycho behavior.
On edit: I'm not sure how the suit against McDonalds turned out, but I hope he won. I certainly don't think he should have been fired for that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why impose your tripe when it offers NOTHING to the thread, other than to impose?
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#26
I'm far more inclined to trust the attacked employer as to when he felt he was no longer in danger.
EOTE
Jul 2013
#34
Maybe it was truly excessive force (in that it was more than needed to neutralize the threat).
EOTE
Jul 2013
#66
I don't fault the employee for the initial whacks, but after they were on the ground
penultimate
Jul 2013
#58