Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: White privilege excuses [View all]

unblock

(56,220 posts)
1. it's interesting how "beyond a reasonable doubt" is such a tough standard
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jul 2013

when the victim is black. but then look at all the innocent black people in prison after a "fair" trial.
somehow beyond a reasonable doubt wasn't a very tough standard when they were on trial.

yes, i know, sometimes there's no wiggle room and race considerations can't come into play. sometimes white innocent people go to prison, too.

but if there's room to fudge it, room for doubt, that's where racism comes into play. the jurors identified with the accused instead of the victim, and that determined the outcome. it's hard to imagine the jury would have reached the same conclusion with the races reversed. in fact, it's hard to believe the case would have gone to trial; were zimmerman black, he surely would have cut a deal as a trial would have been a disaster.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White privilege excuses»Reply #1