Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]FarCenter
(19,429 posts)10. Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-
Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-, sucrose-, fructose-, and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/87/5/1194.full
HFCS has about 10% more fructose than cane sugar, but it is not enough to matter, compared with the amount of sugar consumed as a principle cause of obesity.
While consumption of sucrose compared with HFCS-sweetened beverages induced a small increase in the 24-h insulin AUC in 34 subjects, the effects of sucrose and HFCS on 24-h circulating glucose, leptin, and ghrelin concentrations were not otherwise different. Thus, it appears that sucrose and HFCS do not have substantially different short-term effects on endocrine signals involved in body-weight regulation. Consumption of HFCS beverages also did not increase postprandial TG levels to a greater extent than those observed during consumption of sucrose-sweetened beverages.
Comparison of the effects of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and HFCS beverages within the same male subjects demonstrated that postprandial glucose and insulin responses were intermediate between the lower responses induced by pure fructose and the larger responses induced by pure glucose. Unexpectedly, the effects of short-term consumption of HFCS and sucrose on postprandial TG levels were not intermediate to those of fructose and glucose but comparable to fructose alone. Studies to determine whether these high postprandial TG levels are sustained during long-term consumption of sucrose and HFCS are needed. Additional studies in women and in subjects with and without components of the metabolic syndrome, as well as dose-response studies, are needed to more fully understand the metabolic effects of fructose-containing sugars.
Comparison of the effects of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and HFCS beverages within the same male subjects demonstrated that postprandial glucose and insulin responses were intermediate between the lower responses induced by pure fructose and the larger responses induced by pure glucose. Unexpectedly, the effects of short-term consumption of HFCS and sucrose on postprandial TG levels were not intermediate to those of fructose and glucose but comparable to fructose alone. Studies to determine whether these high postprandial TG levels are sustained during long-term consumption of sucrose and HFCS are needed. Additional studies in women and in subjects with and without components of the metabolic syndrome, as well as dose-response studies, are needed to more fully understand the metabolic effects of fructose-containing sugars.
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/87/5/1194.full
HFCS has about 10% more fructose than cane sugar, but it is not enough to matter, compared with the amount of sugar consumed as a principle cause of obesity.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It helps to pay attention to studies that aren't funded by big ag, oil companies, etc.
Apophis
Jul 2013
#5
You have to wonder why 'they' work so hard to disprove scientific studies here
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#7
The same study showed that female rats given sucrose gained no more than HFCS
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#75
I think Costco is just now also carrying Mexican Fanta. Picked up a case last weekend.
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#51
I remember reading somewhere that people's sensitivity to the HFCS flavor varies
LadyHawkAZ
Jul 2013
#77
Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
So because one person made a post, this site reeks with supporters who think exactly the same thing?
meegbear
Jul 2013
#82
I don't know if they actually choose HFCS for themselves, but I do know there's a contingent...
Hekate
Jul 2013
#17
In the 70s in Michigan "fresh fruit" was drinking the syrup in a can of peaches.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2013
#20
"I'll bet you are not beefcake material, by the way. " So you are saying that intending as an
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#30
I remember that back in the 1980's when Congress was debating letting Corn Syrup replace
truedelphi
Jul 2013
#127
I was wondering if HFCS had been relabel. -No New Name for High-Fructose Corn Syrup
Jesus Malverde
Jul 2013
#76
Have anything substantive? I have an expertise here that is actually applicable. So fire away.
enki23
Jul 2013
#57
So the entire basis of your argument is they are smart so nobody can question them?
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#100
It's amazing watching the thread progress, and watching some panic over this
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#106
So, you're saying the answer is "no." You have nothing substantive to say to what I wrote.
enki23
Jul 2013
#117
This is an internet 'genius', posting his educational prowess (spew) on the DU because, well
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#121
That study is a mess, starting with the way they set up the comparison groups. The conditions
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#49
There are also people who promote the idea that substituting sucrose for HFCS will make you slimmer
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#93