Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)76. I was wondering if HFCS had been relabel. -No New Name for High-Fructose Corn Syrup
The United States Food and Drug Administration has rejected a request from the Corn Refiners Association to change the name of high-fructose corn syrup.
The association, which represents the companies that make the syrup, had petitioned the F.D.A. in September 2010 to begin calling the much-maligned sweetener corn sugar. The request came on the heels of a national advertising campaign promoting the syrup as a natural ingredient made from corn.
But in a letter, Michael M. Landa, director of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition at the F.D.A., denied the petition, saying that the term sugar is used only for food that is solid, dried and crystallized.
HFCS is an aqueous solution sweetener derived from corn after enzymatic hydrolysis of cornstarch, followed by enzymatic conversion of glucose (dextrose) to fructose, the letter stated. Thus, the use of the term sugar to describe HFCS, a product that is a syrup, would not accurately identify or describe the basic nature of the food or its characterizing properties.
In addition, the F.D.A. concluded that the term corn sugar has been used to describe the sweetener dextrose and therefore should not be used to describe high-fructose corn syrup. The agency also said the term corn sugar could pose a risk to consumers who have been advised to avoid fructose because of a hereditary fructose intolerance or fructose malabsorption.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/no-new-name-for-high-fructose-corn-syrup/
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It helps to pay attention to studies that aren't funded by big ag, oil companies, etc.
Apophis
Jul 2013
#5
You have to wonder why 'they' work so hard to disprove scientific studies here
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#7
The same study showed that female rats given sucrose gained no more than HFCS
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#75
I think Costco is just now also carrying Mexican Fanta. Picked up a case last weekend.
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#51
I remember reading somewhere that people's sensitivity to the HFCS flavor varies
LadyHawkAZ
Jul 2013
#77
Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
So because one person made a post, this site reeks with supporters who think exactly the same thing?
meegbear
Jul 2013
#82
I don't know if they actually choose HFCS for themselves, but I do know there's a contingent...
Hekate
Jul 2013
#17
In the 70s in Michigan "fresh fruit" was drinking the syrup in a can of peaches.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2013
#20
"I'll bet you are not beefcake material, by the way. " So you are saying that intending as an
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#30
I remember that back in the 1980's when Congress was debating letting Corn Syrup replace
truedelphi
Jul 2013
#127
I was wondering if HFCS had been relabel. -No New Name for High-Fructose Corn Syrup
Jesus Malverde
Jul 2013
#76
Have anything substantive? I have an expertise here that is actually applicable. So fire away.
enki23
Jul 2013
#57
So the entire basis of your argument is they are smart so nobody can question them?
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#100
It's amazing watching the thread progress, and watching some panic over this
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#106
So, you're saying the answer is "no." You have nothing substantive to say to what I wrote.
enki23
Jul 2013
#117
This is an internet 'genius', posting his educational prowess (spew) on the DU because, well
DainBramaged
Jul 2013
#121
That study is a mess, starting with the way they set up the comparison groups. The conditions
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#49
There are also people who promote the idea that substituting sucrose for HFCS will make you slimmer
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#93