General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What the "Snowden is a traitor" crowd don't get [View all]noise
(2,392 posts)notion of "specialness." Critics say "How dare Snowden appoint himself arbiter of leaks! Who does he think he is!" He saw abuse of power and felt leaking was worth the risk of government retaliation. I guess that makes him guilty of believing people should not be subject to unreasonable data collection efforts.
OTOH some government officials and intelligence officials would have the public believe they are so special that they should be celebrated when they claim they cannot do their job without trashing the Constitution and making a mockery of the Geneva Conventions. The proof that vast counterterrorism powers are required to prevent terrorist attacks? Unsubstantiated claims based on classified information. How sick is this?
If anyone in government truly believes they need the crutch of massive, intrusive surveillance and the power to have murder lists then by all means please find another line of work. Why should anyone accept this police state garbage?