General Discussion

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)

15. Ha ha. At least six major store chains have refused to sell it.

Reply to morningfog (Reply #14)

Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:39 PM

Jul 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rolling Stone�s Boston Bomber Cover Is Brilliant [View all] morningfog Jul 2013 OP

How dare a 'terrorist' look human. The nerve. RC Jul 2013 #1

The pic RS chose was a glamour shot, not reality: SunSeeker Jul 2013 #58

K&R marions ghost Jul 2013 #2

The other point is it will sell the magazine and drive traffic to the story, morningfog Jul 2013 #3

Yes--that's what all magazine covers try to do of course, marions ghost Jul 2013 #7

Not in MA.. geckosfeet Jul 2013 #13

Ironically, every MA/Boston new outlet has been running it. Never has a Rolling Stone morningfog Jul 2013 #14

Ha ha. At least six major store chains have refused to sell it. geckosfeet Jul 2013 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jul 2013 #4

yeah, not sure what they mean by that elehhhhna Jul 2013 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jul 2013 #8

have heard a lot of comments about it being like jim morrison cover. ejpoeta Jul 2013 #52

Agree, it's brilliant, provocative journalism. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #6

It's being whipped up by TV and the MSM themselves warrant46 Jul 2013 #45

Here's my theory RZM Jul 2013 #9

Remains to be seen: people who live in the Boston area are pissed, and babylonsister Jul 2013 #10

They're trying to sell mags to girls who think he's too cute ileus Jul 2013 #11

Doubtful... Agschmid Jul 2013 #36

Perhaps It's About The Looks Of A monster/terrorist grilled onions Jul 2013 #12

Our media are bought and owned. Some folks think they can control every corner of media coverage. LuckyLib Jul 2013 #16

+1 Agschmid Jul 2013 #37

Another +1 drgoodword Jul 2013 #66

My objection to it lastlib Jul 2013 #17

I agree - but temmer Jul 2013 #28

"monster" is not an ambivalent term. lastlib Jul 2013 #47

They should have used a mug shot. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #18

It was a tasteless cover and vapid, pointless journalism. SunSeeker Jul 2013 #19

Did you read the article? Spider Jerusalem Jul 2013 #22

Larry O'Donnell read it ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #23

Must be nice not needing to think for yourself (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Jul 2013 #25

i trust o'donnell but am willing to hear if you had a different opinion JI7 Jul 2013 #29

..... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2013 #33

i might based on what people say, but i don't read every book, article etc JI7 Jul 2013 #34

I planned to read it myself at some point ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #43

The killer is called an extremist, bomber and a monster on the freaking cover! Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #60

Did YOU read the article? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #63

Did you? SunSeeker Jul 2013 #24

what most likely happened was JI7 Jul 2013 #30

What most likely happened was Capt. Obvious Jul 2013 #40

So? Spider Jerusalem Jul 2013 #31

to be fair DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #35

Do you think Tsarnaev will make money from it? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #38

Watch those metaphors: surrealAmerican Jul 2013 #50

But they didn't answer the "why" question, so what was the point of the article? nt SunSeeker Jul 2013 #57

Exactly ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #64

The mantra has been "Did you read the article?" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #44

Exactly. The Matt Taibbi articles ARE brilliant SunSeeker Jul 2013 #56

I agree 100% with your comment about it. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #32

Oh MY GOD11!!! MNBrewer Jul 2013 #46

There's No Such Thing As Bad Publicity. Paladin Jul 2013 #49

Timothy McVeigh made the cover of Time over years mc51tc Jul 2013 #20

they all show him wearing a prison jumpsuit alp227 Jul 2013 #21

yes, it's like putting one of those Blonde Jodi Arias pics on Glamour JI7 Jul 2013 #27

that's time magazine JI7 Jul 2013 #26

Please... for God's sake, out of respect for the victims... dogknob Jul 2013 #39

I don't get the outrage over this. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #41

I only have one question for those who are outraged? malaise Jul 2013 #42

He's incredibly hawt. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #48

I hope everyone is aware that this same pic was on the front page New York Times librechik Jul 2013 #51

It doesn't offend me in the slightest. AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #53

Trayvon Martin was judged on his looks and his life cut tragically short. Skwmom Jul 2013 #54

What the cover points out is the fact that avebury Jul 2013 #55

The shithead shouldn't be on the cover at all. BlueStater Jul 2013 #59

Some folks are upset because the cold, smug, unfeeling image of a killer they find Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #61

Now you know why we need NSA surveillance. ErikJ Jul 2013 #62

But PaulKersey Jul 2013 #65