Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rolling Stone’s Boston Bomber Cover Is Brilliant [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)31. So?
The New York Times said the same thing:
Mr. Tsarnaev was a skilled deflector of curiosity about his personal affairs. He rarely talked about his background except to say that he was Chechen or had lived in Russia. He was popular he had a lot of girls hitting on him, said Junes Umarov, 18, a close friend who is also of Chechen descent but even other close friends could not say whether he had a girlfriend.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/us/dzhokhar-tsarnaevs-dark-side-carefully-masked.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
I don't see how that's "glorifying" as much as it is reporting facts; the idea that he was popular and well-liked by his fellow students and teachers, and by all accounts seemed like a promising young man, makes the case all the more troubling (there wouldn't be all this outrage over the photo and accompanying story if he'd been a pimply-faced geek and an eccentric and isolated introvert, like Adam Lanza or Jared Loughner); here's someone who seems to have a lot of things going for him, and in some ways to be an excellent illustration of America's promise to immigrants...and then, he goes terribly wrong and becomes a bomber and mass killer; the question of "why?" is one that it's useful to ask, if only because there may be other young men like him out there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ironically, every MA/Boston new outlet has been running it. Never has a Rolling Stone
morningfog
Jul 2013
#14
Our media are bought and owned. Some folks think they can control every corner of media coverage.
LuckyLib
Jul 2013
#16
The killer is called an extremist, bomber and a monster on the freaking cover!
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#60
But they didn't answer the "why" question, so what was the point of the article? nt
SunSeeker
Jul 2013
#57
I hope everyone is aware that this same pic was on the front page New York Times
librechik
Jul 2013
#51
Some folks are upset because the cold, smug, unfeeling image of a killer they find
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#61