Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(67,189 posts)

8. Probably because the event was just two weeks past at that point

Thu Jul 18, 2013, 11:06 AM

Jul 2013

A case can be made that it's less immediate now and therefore appears more sensationalistic and exploitive when used as a cover story. YMMV.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The New Rolling Stone Cover Offends the Senses! [View all] last1standing Jul 2013 OP

thank you. that is so right. i have been trying to say this to ejpoeta Jul 2013 #1

"It could be anyone." last1standing Jul 2013 #6

+ 100 nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #15

The Boston Globe, April 19 Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #2

He grew up in the US with so many advantages. last1standing Jul 2013 #7

Because the answers... Javaman Jul 2013 #9

Maybe that's it. I don't know. last1standing Jul 2013 #11

JMYHO, the answer is: Modern Life BrotherIvan Jul 2013 #12

Possibly but... Javaman Jul 2013 #14

what turns kids into monsters? Javaman Jul 2013 #13

The same picture was on the front page House of Roberts Jul 2013 #3

And yet Larry O'Donnell did not attack them Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #4

Probably because the event was just two weeks past at that point Orrex Jul 2013 #8

Yeah, remember the uproar from that? Scuba Jul 2013 #5

Deep down, I think a lot of people want the media to be biased. noamnety Jul 2013 #10