Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
28. Here's the problem,
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jul 2013

"Now, Post-Snowden, we are paying attention...For that, we are in debt to Snowden and his supporters."

...to claim that Snowden's actions helped to focus attention on an issue is one thing. It's another thing entirely to claim that "we" should be "in debt" to him.

I don't buy into the notion that the only way to have focused attention on the issue was by leaking classified information in the way that he did, via distortions that tried to portray the program as something it was not, and then maintaining that he revealed "criminality."

Snowden's motives have always been suspect. While the debate is welcomed, his actions are still suspect. The fact that he created a circus with his international adventure, sparking international incidents, and injecting himself into the story throughout, shows that his motive was not a debate about the NSA domestic programs. His actions were idiotic and self-serving.

I'll repeat this point.

Bush's illegal spying was exposed in 2005 by Thomas Tamm. FISA has always been controversial and challenged by civil liberties groups and some lawmakers (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023009232). Criticism of Snowden's actions that led him to reveal U.S. state secrets to other countries and find himself stuck in Russia have nothing to do with anyone's opinion of the ongoing debate about NSA domestic program.

Don't expect people to overlook Snowden's actions overseas simply because there is an ongoing debate and renewed focus on the program. Not going to happen.

Snowden is a delusional and self-important clown. He and Greenwald (and their supports) have done everything to help make the story about them.

First, Greenwald announces that he has enough information to bring down the U.S.

Snowden follows by declaring he's immune to torture.

He's applying for temporary asylum in Russia.

Doesn't get any more bizarre than that. Well...

Edward Snowden Declares Himself Torture-Proof
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023275112

If Snowden's case as a whistleblower is so strong, why is he afraid to face the consequences?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023236549

Putin: U.S.-Russia Relations Greater Than Snowden

Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear Wednesday that he holds his country's relationship with the United States in higher esteem than he does former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, Reuters reported.

When a reporter asked if the Snowden case would negatively affect a September summit between the U.S. and Russia in Moscow, Putin responded that "bilateral relations, in my opinion, are far more important than squabbles about the activities of the secret services," according to Reuters.

"We warned Mr. Snowden that any action by him that could cause damage to Russian-American relations is unacceptable for us," he added, as quoted by Reuters.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/putin-us-russia-relations-greater-than-snowden


"Personally, I didn't know anything about the extent of it, but I have generally been aware of the potential for my electronic communications to be stored & monitored, & have tried to conduct myself accordingly. I don't think I'm unique in that regard."

Knowing the "extent" of the program is not justification for Snowden's actions, especially those that compromised U.S. state secrets.

Not knowing the "extent" is not the same as not being aware of the concerns.

Wyden on Senate floor: FISA’s ‘general warrants’ are like the ‘Writs of Assistance’ the founding fat
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022081086

Senator Wyden (D-Ore.) calls for oversight of agencies that might be monitoring Americans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022081177

PATRIOT Act Being Used to Keep Super Duper Government Spy Operation Top Secret
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002440614

House votes to renew controversial surveillance law
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014228212

Obama signs FISA extension..5 more years.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022111527

There is clearly a disagreement about the program, but it was authorized by Congress. The "extent" of the program maybe in question, but there is still nothing illegal about it. That fact, together with fleeing the country and revealing U.S. state secrets, is why Snowden will not be considered a whistleblower.

Members of Congress have oversight of the program. It's good they're awake now, but I doubt that bodes well for Snowden.

Sen. Tester Calls On Snowden To Return To America To ‘Face The Music’
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023281426

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great post, Jackpine, thanks. Scuba Jul 2013 #1
I doubt it's a game changer Shivering Jemmy Jul 2013 #2
We'll see. The debate has certainly shone a light on our moral compasses. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #3
Our government should not be acquring this information no matter what. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #13
I completely agree. k&r n/t Laelth Jul 2013 #4
Love your sig line. Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #5
Thanks. I haven't changed it since the Summer of 2009. Laelth Jul 2013 #11
And I love yours too bread_and_roses Jul 2013 #14
Elegantly stated. think4yourself Jul 2013 #6
Q&A Time in Congress = Finally marions ghost Jul 2013 #10
In an indirect way, that's what really disturbs me.... Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #7
The NSA apparatus was built marions ghost Jul 2013 #20
I'd contend all of congress knew about it and is trying to cover their asses Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #23
At a higher level, it doesn't really matter Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #24
I think they knew too Go Vols Jul 2013 #29
the aclu's newest law suit says questionseverything Jul 2013 #30
Yes but how much did they really know? marions ghost Jul 2013 #26
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jul 2013 #8
Agree. nt navarth Jul 2013 #9
And, if it can bring renewed attention to other reports about massive suveillance KoKo Jul 2013 #12
The issue is Snowdenballing. Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #15
Secret Courts allow us to... whttevrr Jul 2013 #16
"Ever hear of that?" Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #17
CRAP!! whttevrr Jul 2013 #18
I hear Nossink Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #21
Yes. nt freedom fighter jh Jul 2013 #19
Good post, Jackpine! K&R Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #22
DURec leftstreet Jul 2013 #25
Well, blogs and talking heads are talking some about it but baronjake Jul 2013 #27
Here's the problem, ProSense Jul 2013 #28
Lol. n/t ronnie624 Jul 2013 #32
Lol! Th1onein Jul 2013 #33
Great post! deurbano Jul 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In a major way, it doesn'...»Reply #28