Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Surveillance Blowback: The Making of the U.S. Surveillance State, 1898-2020 [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)18. The Brave New World of Big Data
Netflix and Surveillance
by KATE EPSTEIN
CounterPunch, JULY 17, 2013
EXCERPT...
But big data has another side, better predicted by Aldous Huxleys very different 1932 dystopia Brave New World. In that version of the future, consumer desire, and not thought-policing, keeps the citizens of the World State in line in a year defined not by A.D. but by A.F., or After Ford. Sex-hormone chewing gum, the ecstasy-inducing drug soma (one cubic centimeter cures ten gloomy sentiments,) and recreational sex are all encouraged, as is attending the popular feelies, which combine sight, smell, and touch to create the ultimate entertainment experience.
In many ways we are living out some bizarre combination of 1984s total surveillance and perception management and Brave New Worlds post-Fordist corporatocracy, in which our actions are monitored and our perceptions managed just as much to shape our desires and then fulfill them as to root out dissidents and quash dissent. It is, after all, corporations like Booz Allen that conduct most of the government surveillance in our brave, deregulated, new world. Although one function of all that data is security, which is a lucrative enough industry on its own, an even more profitable function is the better understanding of consumer decision-making that can be assembled from the over 2.8 zettabytes of data that exists in the world.
Like the characters in Huxleys dystopia (most of whom believed they lived in a utopia), we exist in an entertainment-saturated society. Much of that entertainment is delivered to us through one company: Netflix, which caters to approximately 30 million viewers and is more watched than cable television. I thought of feelies, and of Huxleys broader vision, when I heard about Netflixs new strategy for creating original content, employed for the first time with House of Cards this past Februaryone that involves using billions of data points to better understand what its viewers want to see.
SNIP...
This information has long dictated what content Netflix decides to license and recommend to different viewers, but House of Cards was the first time any company had ever used such data in the creative production process for a T.V. show. It started when Netflix noticed that there was significant overlap between the circles of viewers who watched movies starring Kevin Spacey and movies directed by David Fincher from beginning to end, and viewers who loved the original 1990 BBC miniseries House of Cards. Subscribers were shown one of ten different trailers for the series based on their consumer profiles. The producers also knew, from studying viewers watching patterns, that releasing all thirteen episodes at once would promote and reward the binge-like behavior demonstrated by their target audience. The new strategy paid off, with ten percent of Netflix subscribers watching the series within two weeks of its debut, and 80% of viewers rating it good or exceptional.
SNIP...
As technology advances, corporations are developing both more precise ways to monitor our behavior and smarter algorithms to crunch that data. Last year, Verizon applied for a patent for a type of monitoring technology that uses infrared cameras and microphones to track and collect consumer behaviorsuch as eating, exercising, reading, and sleepingin the vicinity of a TV or mobile device. Embedded in cable boxes in living rooms across America, this Orwellian tool would presumably help companies get to know us just a little bit better. Marketing firms use eye tracking to measure how elements of advertisements are perceived, retained and recalled, and corporations use facial recognition on billboards hidden cameras to detect age and gender brackets to display targeted ads. Surely these developments raise many of the same privacy concerns as the U.S. intelligence communitys blanket spying programs. When did we agree to give all this personal data away for free? And do we even know its happening?
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/07/17/the-brave-new-world-of-big-data/
PS: Karl Rove and the rest of the Gangster State understand the ancient system. Machiavelli distilled: Use money to gain power. Use power to protect and gain money. Repeat for as long as possible.
by KATE EPSTEIN
CounterPunch, JULY 17, 2013
EXCERPT...
But big data has another side, better predicted by Aldous Huxleys very different 1932 dystopia Brave New World. In that version of the future, consumer desire, and not thought-policing, keeps the citizens of the World State in line in a year defined not by A.D. but by A.F., or After Ford. Sex-hormone chewing gum, the ecstasy-inducing drug soma (one cubic centimeter cures ten gloomy sentiments,) and recreational sex are all encouraged, as is attending the popular feelies, which combine sight, smell, and touch to create the ultimate entertainment experience.
In many ways we are living out some bizarre combination of 1984s total surveillance and perception management and Brave New Worlds post-Fordist corporatocracy, in which our actions are monitored and our perceptions managed just as much to shape our desires and then fulfill them as to root out dissidents and quash dissent. It is, after all, corporations like Booz Allen that conduct most of the government surveillance in our brave, deregulated, new world. Although one function of all that data is security, which is a lucrative enough industry on its own, an even more profitable function is the better understanding of consumer decision-making that can be assembled from the over 2.8 zettabytes of data that exists in the world.
Like the characters in Huxleys dystopia (most of whom believed they lived in a utopia), we exist in an entertainment-saturated society. Much of that entertainment is delivered to us through one company: Netflix, which caters to approximately 30 million viewers and is more watched than cable television. I thought of feelies, and of Huxleys broader vision, when I heard about Netflixs new strategy for creating original content, employed for the first time with House of Cards this past Februaryone that involves using billions of data points to better understand what its viewers want to see.
SNIP...
This information has long dictated what content Netflix decides to license and recommend to different viewers, but House of Cards was the first time any company had ever used such data in the creative production process for a T.V. show. It started when Netflix noticed that there was significant overlap between the circles of viewers who watched movies starring Kevin Spacey and movies directed by David Fincher from beginning to end, and viewers who loved the original 1990 BBC miniseries House of Cards. Subscribers were shown one of ten different trailers for the series based on their consumer profiles. The producers also knew, from studying viewers watching patterns, that releasing all thirteen episodes at once would promote and reward the binge-like behavior demonstrated by their target audience. The new strategy paid off, with ten percent of Netflix subscribers watching the series within two weeks of its debut, and 80% of viewers rating it good or exceptional.
SNIP...
As technology advances, corporations are developing both more precise ways to monitor our behavior and smarter algorithms to crunch that data. Last year, Verizon applied for a patent for a type of monitoring technology that uses infrared cameras and microphones to track and collect consumer behaviorsuch as eating, exercising, reading, and sleepingin the vicinity of a TV or mobile device. Embedded in cable boxes in living rooms across America, this Orwellian tool would presumably help companies get to know us just a little bit better. Marketing firms use eye tracking to measure how elements of advertisements are perceived, retained and recalled, and corporations use facial recognition on billboards hidden cameras to detect age and gender brackets to display targeted ads. Surely these developments raise many of the same privacy concerns as the U.S. intelligence communitys blanket spying programs. When did we agree to give all this personal data away for free? And do we even know its happening?
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/07/17/the-brave-new-world-of-big-data/
PS: Karl Rove and the rest of the Gangster State understand the ancient system. Machiavelli distilled: Use money to gain power. Use power to protect and gain money. Repeat for as long as possible.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
22 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Surveillance Blowback: The Making of the U.S. Surveillance State, 1898-2020 [View all]
Octafish
Jul 2013
OP
McCoy kicked CIA in the nuts with his book on the Company's role in the international drug trade.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#3
K&R + a 2008 article that needs to be reread today largely based on Professor McCoy's work
bobthedrummer
Jul 2013
#16
Private contractors do most intelligence gathering, targeting their critics (Americans for Political
bobthedrummer
Jul 2013
#21