Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)

4. So the White House just did it anyway

Reply to OnyxCollie (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 19, 2013, 12:02 PM

Jul 2013

Why do we even bother with the charade of representative government and the mirage of a system of laws?

The laws work great when it involves putting black kids in prison for having a bag of dope. But they don't seem to work on Wall Street, and they most certainly have no influence over the NSA.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congress said it never intended to allow NSA to build database of calls. [View all] The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP

Congress created this problem TheLion Jul 2013 #1

Power We Didn't Grant OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #2

So the White House just did it anyway BlueStreak Jul 2013 #4

There's a representative government. OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #6

Touche. You are correct, sir (or madam) BlueStreak Jul 2013 #8

Claiming Congress understood all the impolications of what a secret court could do with no oversight BlueStreak Jul 2013 #3

"What happened to our Obama?" OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #7

OK. Then he stopped trying to conceal it after winning a second term BlueStreak Jul 2013 #9

Really? Your claim is that Congress is full of powerless morons. jeff47 Jul 2013 #11

A congressman has more power than a President? Wanna try that one again. BlueStreak Jul 2013 #14

Congress has more power than the president. jeff47 Jul 2013 #15

I guess that is why they are called co-equal branches BlueStreak Jul 2013 #16

They aren't called co-equal branches. jeff47 Jul 2013 #18

Somebody should break that news to Thomas Jefferson BlueStreak Jul 2013 #20

Yeah, a quote is far more important than reality. jeff47 Jul 2013 #21

You said they are not called "Co-equal". I quoted Jefferson using that exact terminology. BlueStreak Jul 2013 #22

Jefferson could have called them anything he liked. jeff47 Jul 2013 #23

Well if they weren't so busy repealing Obamacare a thousand times tularetom Jul 2013 #5

K&R woo me with science Jul 2013 #10

They didn't know, didn't intend, and didn't care. All they wanted to do was BS kelliekat44 Jul 2013 #12

Don't ask don't tell Bradical79 Jul 2013 #13

kr HiPointDem Jul 2013 #17

Good time to try some bi-partisanship? kentuck Jul 2013 #19