General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A question for those who feel that the correct verdict was rendered in the Zimmerman trial. [View all]TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)for getting the guy the kills them.
I can get that there is a lack of evidence leads to the outcome in the case but that lame logic doesn't really fly to me. No way that kid had any obligation to kowtow to Zimmerman and take his chances and too fucking bad he didn't bust that melon wide open.
As much as I believe Zimmerman did it, I couldn't vote to convict based on the case made but you are getting gross in the stretches to make it all okay. It isn't fucking okay but I'm not one of these burden of proof on the person claiming self defense crazies either and can separate what I believe from what is proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the state.
Hell, for capital crimes and maybe even all felonies (since peoples lives are trashed) I favor raising the standard to beyond a shadow of a doubt which would mean some heinous fuckers would literally get away with murder, I wouldn't pretend they were fine, upstanding, and decent to justify my bar though.