General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A question for those who feel that the correct verdict was rendered in the Zimmerman trial. [View all]Captain Stern
(2,249 posts)Martin's body was found 70 yards from from where he was headed ....not 70 feet. (since you told me to do the math, I'll respectfully ask you to do the same)
And you're also mistaken about what I said. I didn't say that the jury not knowing what happened made it "ok for George Zimmerman to shoot that kid". Do you honestly think that is what I said? Be honest....is that really what you think I said? Try being somewhat objective, and at least glance at a few facts. Just because somebody disagrees with you, doesn't mean they are saying it's ok to shoot unarmed kids.
My point is that juries are presented with evidence, and then they have to make a decision based on that evidence. In this case, they needed to see actual evidence that disproved Zimmerman's version of events beyond a reasonable doubt. They didn't see that.
I don't believe Zimmerman's version of the events (which I stated in my previous post), but I don't think the prosecutors gave the jury enough to convict Martin. In my opinion, when a jury errs, it should be on the side of the defendant. I'd rather see some guilty folks go free, than see innocent folks convicted.